The following transaction has occurred in:
Conservatorship of Edwina Fuller v. Fuller et al. Case: B241452 2nd District, Division p Date (YYYY-MM-DD): 2012-10-05 Event Description: Record on appeal filed. Notes: C-1, R-1 For more information on this case, go to: http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=2&doc_id=2015255&q=303486&f=546087288
Defendants, Robert L. Fuller and Doris A. Fuller appeals were dismissed by the Court on 08/25/2012 per rule 8.140(b). As to the defendant’s motion for reinstatement the defendants have a history of using delaying tactics in order to prevent these cases against them from coming to a timely conclusion. Their attorney, Daniel K. Lak has asked for and received continuance after continuance after continuance with the Superior Court, has a history of not filing documents with the Court in a timely manner, erroneously filling paperwork or not filling all of it as in this case. Daniel K. Lak filed Notice of Appeal and notified the Plaintiffs via the US Postal Service when he very well knew Plaintiffs were represented by Council. Defendants, Robert L. Fuller and Doris A. Fuller aka Doris Fuller-Stewart were ordered in Los Angeles Superior Court to pay all of Plaintiffs’ attorney fees, which they have failed to perform. Robert L. Fuller and Doris A. Fuller-Stewart were also ordered to turn over all Trust assets to the Court Trustee, Attorney Patrick J. Barnitt, which they have also failed to perform in direct violation of the decision rendered by the lower Court. But, instead turned over a Trust asset, the real estate located at 8625 S. 12th Avenue, Inglewood, CA. 90305 to an unknown entity in direct defiance of the lower Court’s order. The defendants, Robert L. Fuller and Doris A. Fuller were also ordered to pay Conservatee Edwina J. Fuller in excess of $107,000.00 which they have failed to perform. I also understand and am led to believe that the defendants, Robert L. Fuller and Doris A. Fuller are under investigation by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department in reference to the possible filing of criminal charges in association with their elder abuse, fraud, undue influence and financial elder abuse. In regards to Appeal Case B241452, the Conservatorship of Edwina J. Fuller v. Fuller et al., LASC BP099211, attorney Daniel Lak improperly served the Notice of Appeal to the wrong opposing attorney. Atty. Sandra Anderson left the case a very long time ago as the attorney for the Conservatee Mrs. Edwina J. Fuller and was replaced by Attorney Sybil Burrell which Mr. Lak is or should have reasonably been aware of when he filed his clients Notice of Appeal. Therefore, the defendants Appeal should be denied with prejudice and remanded to the lower court as I believe that the defendants and their attorney are making a mockery of the Court with their frivolous assertions.
See also: B241450