Friday Night Fights, In Case You Missed It

Fantasy Casino

Kevin Watts (3-0-2k) of Lancaster, one half of the Watts twins, continues to improve as he boxed and brawled his way to his 4th straight win, dropping the game Julian Cruz of Acapulco, Mex. With a sharp right hand in the third round. Cruz tried his damndest, but couldn't match Watts in skill, speed or power.

Kevin Watts blasts Cruz in match

.Tevin Watts (1-0) brawled his way to a draw over 4rds.

Tevin Watts has Lopez in check.

Against Gustavo Lopez (0-1)of King City Az. Lopez introduced Tevin to the rougher side of pro boxing as he hardly gave the more skilled Tevin to establish a rhythm with his mauling anything goes attitude. He head butted Watts in the 2nd(I guess by accident) and roughed Tevin up enough to make him fight his style. Tevin landed the cleaner, harder shots. The scores were: 39-37 Watts, 38-38 and 38-38. 

Tevin’s textbook right hand

http://westcoastboxing.com/2014/01/january-24-2014-friday-night-fights-a-real-mixed-bag-at-fantasy-springs/

U.S. Official: Elder Abuse Is 'Broad and Widespread'

Written by David Heitz | Published on January 27, 2014

In an interview with Healthline, U.S. Assistant Secretary for Aging Kathy Greenlee said she has an idea why. “Compared to other social movements, you have survivors who have led the charge. For the elderly, that's not the case," Greenlee said. "These people are frail and often have cognitive impairment. It's the rest of us who need to raise the voice for them.”

Numbers provided by the National Center on Elder Abuse, which is part of the Administration on Aging overseen by Greenlee, show that as many as 10 percent of elderly people suffer from abuse at least once per year. That number does not include financial exploitation, which is an increasingly common form of elder abuse.

...Elder Abuse Study in 2010 showed that 41 out of 1,000 elderly people surveyed reported “major” financial exploitation, a higher rate than other forms of abuse, including neglect and emotional, physical, or sexual abuse.

“People think [abuse] is isolated, and only in nursing homes,” Greenlee said. “In fact, it is broad and widespread, and it's often family members.”

Family Members Are Often Perpetrators

Sixteen years ago, the National Center on Elder Abuse conducted the only national study ever of the scope of elder abuse. That report showed that 90 percent of abusers are family members. Greenlee said it remains one of the fastest-growing aspects of elder abuse, a problem that is snowballing as America ages. 

Read more: http://www.healthline.com/health-news/senior-elder-abuse-more-common-than-you-think-012714

Get to know a senior well enough to establish a baseline for mood, behavior, and personality. Without that, you can't tell when something's wrong. 

If an elderly person becomes withdrawn or mistrustful, or develops a relationship with one trusted person to the exclusion of others, 'that's a real red flag.'

If a senior suddenly becomes secretive about finances, something might be awry.

Attorney Discipline, California

DISCIPLINE SYSTEM - OVERVIEW 

WHAT IS THE STATE BAR?
The State Bar of California is an agency within the judicial branch of the government (Cal. Const. Art. VI, sec. 9.) While the power to admit and to discipline attorneys is an inherent power of the courts (Cal. Const. Art VI, sec. 1), the State Bar operates as the administrative arm of the courts in the exercise of this powers (see rule 9.10, Cal. Rules of Court.)

Contrary to popular belief, the State Bar of California is not a bar association. It is an "integrated bar"; membership in the State Bar is not optional if you wish to practice law in California (Bus. & Prof. Code § 6125.) There has been no California State Bar Association since 1927, when the Legislature created the State Bar of California by passing the State Bar Act.

The State Bar can recommend suspension or disbarment for violations of those sections of the State Bar Act that provide for discipline, for violations of the California Rules of Professional Conduct (rules proposed by the State Bar and approved by the Supreme Court as provided in Bus. & Prof. Code §6077) or for a criminal conviction (Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 6101 et seq.) The State Bar Court can impose a public or private reproval on the authority granted to it by the Supreme Court under rule 9.10.

COMPLAINTS
The discipline process most often starts with the receipt of a complaint by the State Bar. There is no standing requirement; anybody can make a complaint about a member. The State Bar operates a toll free complaint hotline to assist in the process of making those complaints.

STATE BAR INVESTIGATIONS
Complaints are not the only starting point for the discipline process. The State Bar has the authority to initiate its own investigations, designated as a "State Bar Investigation" or SBI.

REPORTABLE ACTIONS
A common source for SBIs are so called "reportable actions." Lawyers are required to self-report certain events under Business and Professions Code section 6068(o), such as the imposition of judicial sanctions in excess of $1000 (except for discovery sanctions.) Failure to self report within 30 days is itself a cause of discipline. Banks are required to report dishonored items on client trust accounts (Bus. & Prof. Code §6091.1.) Courts and insurers are also required to report certain events.

CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS
Criminal prosecution agencies are required to report the filing an indictment or information charging an attorney with a crime (Bus. & Prof. Code §6101.)

STRUCTURE OF THE DISCIPLINE SYSTEM
The discipline system incorporates features from both the civil and criminal systems.

The State Bar's prosecution office is called the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel (OCTC.) OCTC investigates allegations of professional misconduct and determines whether is has reasonable cause to file charges with the adjudication office of the State Bar, the State Bar Court.

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF TRIAL COUNSEL
The chief prosecutor and head of OCTC is the Chief Trial Counsel. The Chief Trial Counsel is appointed by the State Bar Board of Governors for a four year term, and must be confirmed by the State Senate. The current Chief Trial Counsel is Scott Drexel.

OCTC consists of four units: Intake, Enforcement, Probation and the Client Security Fund.

STATE BAR COURT
Discipline, admissions, probation revocation and other matters are adjudicated by the State Bar Court. State Bar Court consists of a hearing department of five judges and a review department of three judges.

Cases are venued in Los Angeles or San Francisco, depending on the county where the misconduct allegedly occurred. The Los Angeles hearing department judges are Donald F. Miles, Richard A. Honn and Richard A. Platel. The San Francisco hearing judges are Patricia McElroy and Lucy Armendariz.

The review department functions as the appellate department of State Bar Court and hears certain other matters in the first instance. The presiding judge of the State Bar Court sits on the review department, as do two part-time review judges. The presiding judge of the State Bar Court is Joann Remke; the other two review judges are Judith Epstein and Catherine Purcell.

THE PROGRESS OF A DISCIPLINE MATTER
The OCTC Intake Unit functions as the initial screener of potential discipline matters. Complaints, reportable actions and criminal conviction matters begin their life in Intake. Non-attorney complaint analysts in Intake evaluate complaints under the supervision of Intake deputy trial counsel. At this stage, those matters are designated as "Inquiries." Intake determines if the complaint states a potential violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct or State Bar Act. If so, the matter is sent to the Enforcement Unit of OCTC.

The Enforcement Unit investigates the discipline matters forwarded by Intake, now designated an "Investigation." Enforcement employs non-attorney investigators working under the supervision of deputy trial counsel. The investigator will contact the attorney who the subject of the complaint, known as the "respondent" and request a written reponse to the allegations of the complaint. The investigator can also subpoena court documents, bank records and other documents, and can interview witnesses. OCTC can also conduct investigative depositions.

Respondent attorneys have a statutory duty to cooperate in this investigation (Bus. & Prof. Code §6068(i)) but the respondent can assert statutory and Consitutional privileges, including the attorney client privilege and the privilege against self-incrimination if the conduct involves potential criminal guilt.

Attorneys also have the right to counsel (at their own expense) at any stage of the discipline process (Bus. & Prof Code §6085.) It is always a good idea to consult with experienced discipline defense counsel when contacted by the State Bar regarding a complaint.

OCTC has prosecutorial discretion to determine which cases to prosecute and how to charge them. If it is detemined that reasonable cause exists to file discipline charges, the deputy trial counsel assigned to the matter sends a written notice to the attorney of the State Bar's intent to file discipline charges. This notice requests that the respondent attorney, and the attorney's counsel, if any, meet with the deputy trial counsel within 20 days to attempt to resolve the matter without filing discipline charges (the so-called "20 day" letter.)

If the matter cannot be resolved by agreement, the respondent attorney can ask the State Bar Court to conduct an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference (ENEC) before a State Bar Court judge. Even if the ENEC does not lead to a settlement of the matter, the evaluation by an experienced State Bar Court judge can be valuable for the respondent and respondent's counsel.

If the matter can not be resolved, OCTC will initiate a formal proceeding in State Bar Court by filing a charging document called a notice of discipline charges (NDC) and serving the respondent, at the repondent's State Bar membership address. or respondent's counsel by certified mail. Personal service is not required. A response to the NDC must be filed in State Bar Court within twenty days after service; otherwise the respondent's default will be entered and the all charges will be deemed admitted. Relief from default is very difficult in State Bar Court. For this reason, it is essential to maintain a good address membership records address with the State Bar.

Litigation in State Bar Court is similar to civil litigation but the State Bar has its own Rules of Procedure; apart from discovery, the Code of Civil Procedure does not apply in disciplinary proceedings. Trial before the hearing department is similar to civil trials, except, of course, it is always a bench trial.

Following trial and submission of the matter, the hearing judge is required to issue a written decision within 90 days. That decision can be appealed by either the State Bar or the respondent to the review department by a written request for review filed within thirty days.

Exhaustion of remedies in the review department in the State Bar Court is required to petition the California Supreme Court for review of the State Bar Court's decision. Since 1991, the Supreme Court has granted review in only a handful of disciplinary cases.

http://www.disciplinedefensecounsel.org/disciplinesystem-overview.html

B241450, FULLER vs FULLER ET AL

California 2nd District Court of Appeal
B241450 Fuller vs. Fuller et al.

Greetings,

Robert and Doris have admitted and agreed that they owe Edwina $107,692.30 - BP099211, BP122665 before anyone is paid anything as found and ordered by the court.

Why haven't they been forced to pay these monies in order for their appeal to move forward?

Robert and Doris mention "the assets of the Trust which are rightfully theirs under the Trust" in their Ex Parte Application, dated January 24, 2014.

They fail to mention in their Ex Parte Application that they were found by the Court to have committed "fraud" and "financial elder abuse."

Nor, have they been ordered to do an accounting of the Thelsey L. Fuller Trust while in their control.

We believe that the lower court cases should have been consolidated years ago to save tax payers, the Court and the litigants an awful lot of time and money thus reducing of all things the attorneys' fees.

Those cases are in Los Angeles County Superior Court: BP099211, BP118616, BP122665, BP135381

We've got our nerve but, not $107,692.30 worth that Robert & Doris still owe to Mom or the over $308,000.00 that they stole once combined.

"He was sharp." Doris Aleda Fuller

Robert & Doris claim they did not commit undue influence?

Golden Boy: Tevin 1-0-1, Kevin 4-0

"Kevin Watts won a unanimous decision over Julian Cruz of Acapulco, Mexico in a four round welterweight bout. Watts scored a knockdown in round three as a right hand sent Cruz to the canvas. The Mexican continued to fight on however Watts was the more skilled as he outworked and dominated Cruz to a unanimous decision win as all the judges scored the bout 40-35, 39-36, and 39-36. Kevin Watts improves to 4-0, 2 KO’s, as Cruz falls to 1-3.

Junior middleweights Tevin Watts and Gustavo Lopez fought to a draw in a scheduled four rounder. Watts was the faster of the two firing away with combinations on Lopez as he pressed the early part of the fight. The two fighters traded the second half of the fight as they finished punching away to the final bell. In the end one judge scored it 39-37, overruled by two judges as they had it 38-38 resulting in a majority decision draw. Tevin Watts goes to 1-0-1, as Gustavo Lopez goes to 0-1-1."

http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/results-from-indio-california-5-235716

I'll be sure to get the inside info on Tevin's fight.  Draw? 

Ha!

Kevin appears to have learned, leave no doubt.

Fight on nephews!

Twins Fight Tonight

Fantasy Springs Resort Casino

84-245 Indio Springs Dr, Indio, California 92203

Kevin Watts looking fit and ready at 137.6 lbs for his fight vs Julian Cruz

https://twitter.com/GoldenBoyBoxing/status/426487885374582784/photo/1

Tevin Watts at 145.6 lbs w/ his opponent Gustavo Lopez who came in at 145.6 lbs at today's #GoldenBoyLive weigh in pic.twitter.com/xgBNQ5hdJb

BP099211 - Probate Notes 01/23/2014

Case Number:  BP099211
FULLER, EDWINA - CONSERVATORSHIP

Probate Notes

Department    LA    11     Court Convened at:    08:30 AM    01/23/2014

Honorable Michael I. Levanas 

S.L. Williams , Deputy County Clerk     , Deputy Sheriff 

C. Peters, CSR 5667 , Reporter

BP099211       1014     FULLER, EDWINA - CONSERVATORSHIP     

Conservatorship-Pers  

FINAL REPORT, FEES & DISTRIBUTION

Petitioner(s): Fuller, Steven A.  

Attorney(s): Randall, Teddie J., Esq.  

Continuance Number: 1     Continuance From: Monday, December 2, 2013

Last Date Changed: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 03:49 PM

Last Note Changed By: MGUAYANT

To clear probate notes "filed documents" must be submitted to Rm 258, within time frames set forth in Rule 4.4(b) of LASC Rules. You may contact the Probate Attorney whose E-Mail address appears at the end of these notes, subject to compliance with all conditions governing the use of Interactive E-Mail. E-mail Rules are available in Rm 258 and on the Court's web site at www.LASuperiorCourt.org.

PETN FILED 1/2/13

REVIEWED FROM PETN & IMAGED FILE ONLY

PRIOR ORDERS: Cont to 1/23/14 @ 8:30 a.m. Cont to 12/2/13 (S. Burrell's petn for fees to be filed by 11/1/13 & set on 12/2/13). Cont to 7/16/13 ; 6/27/13 (to clear notes; petn for fees to be filed by 5/31/13 and set for hrg on 6/27/13)

SUMMARY:

Petnr is consr P&E

2nd & final - acct period 9/1/09 - 5/31/12 (per supp)

ntc rels ok

supp filed 7/15/13

beginning balance: 85,000 (r/p)

ending balance: 85,145.29 (per supp; 145.29 cash)

OTHER CASE: BP135381 (consee's probate; petnr Steven is pers rep; ltrs 3/8/13)

FACTS: Consee died on 8/29/11. Petnr alleges there is an outstanding jgmt payable to the consee in the sum of $117,000. Petnr alleges the pers rep of the consee's estate will attempt to collect the jgmt.

Per supp, petnr made monthly pymts of $500 to himself for utilities due to 24-hr oxygen, air mattress, cable tv & other maintenance, med pads, incontinent diapers, care giver expenses, care of consee's dog.

MATTERS TO CLEAR:

C. No allegation re names and addresses of persons requesting spec ntc - supp required

G. Fee request must comply with CRC 7.752, 7.756, 7.702; provide itemized stmt - supp required

NEW AFTER REVIEW OF SUPP:

J. Explain "Direct Deposit Advance" entries in the receipts schedule - supp required

K. Need name of payee and purpose of deposits on pg 13 of receipts schedule - supp required

L. No purpose stated for several withdrawals - supp required

M. There are several disbursements w/out any payee or purpose stated - supp required

N. Explain the partial rent payments made to petnr, payment for advance funds, finance charges - supp required

O. Petnr's reimb request includes 5,000 pd to atty Anderson, 5,000 pd to atty Burrell, 5,000 pd to atty Barrington. If petnr is requesting reimb for these expenses, need fee decs from each atty, addressing factors in CRC 7.702 and see CRC 7.752

P. Ntc bond company deemed requirede

*******************************

OBJECTIONS FILED 4/2/13

OBJECTORS: Robert Fuller and Doris Fuller

REPRESENTED BY: Marshal A. Oldman

SUMMARY:

Objrs are children

prf of svc ok

ARGUMENT: Objrs contend schedule C of the acct is incomplete (no details of 16,319.50 in disbursements); fee request is not complete; expenses are unreasonable; no acct of the 500/mo allowance.

*******************************

RELIEF:

1. JTD consr fees, 10,000 (836.5 hrs at 12/hr)

2. JTD acct. COMMENT: The acct is incomplete and vague in many aspects.

3. JTD reimb petnr 26,400. COMMENT: Exh 2 attached to supp provides a total of 16,300 (1,300 filing fee reimb & 15,000 atty retainer reimb). As to atty retainer, see note O; balance of the 26,400 s/b DWOP as there is no justification provided.

4. JTD exoneration of bond

o/w atty fees 2,500.00 (allowed) ok

PA COMMENTS: See Prior Orders and remaining notes; ultimately all matters to mediation and/or evidentiary hrg.

mguayante@lasuperiorcourt.org

MG(4/12/13)(7/10)(11/21)(1/15/14)

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION:

RELATED ITEMS: 1015-1017

Order to be Prepared By     Clerk:     Attorney:

Department    LA    11     Court Convened at:    08:30 AM    01/23/2014

Honorable Michael I. Levanas 

S.L. Williams , Deputy County Clerk     , Deputy Sheriff 

C. Peters, CSR 5667 , Reporter

BP099211       1015     FULLER, EDWINA - CONSERVATORSHIP     

Conservatorship-Pers  

FINAL REPORT, FEES & DISTRIBUTION

Petitioner(s): Fuller, Steven A.  

Attorney(s): Randall, Teddie J., Esq.  

Continuance Number: 4     Continuance From: Monday, December 2, 2013

Last Date Changed: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 03:50 PM

Last Note Changed By: MGUAYANT

To clear probate notes "filed documents" must be submitted to Rm 258, within time frames set forth in Rule 4.4(b) of LASC Rules. You may contact the Probate Attorney whose E-Mail address appears at the end of these notes, subject to compliance with all conditions governing the use of Interactive E-Mail. E-mail Rules are available in Rm 258 and on the Court's web site at www.LASuperiorCourt.org.

PETN FILED 7/15/13

PRIOR ORDERS: Cont to 1/23/14 (Counsel informs the court that there is an appeal pending; the outcome will affect all legal fees).

SUMMARY:

Petnr is consr P&E

post-death acct - acct period 6/2/12 (d/d) - 7/1/13

ntc rels ok

beginning balance: 85,145.29

ending balance: 85,145.29 (145.29 cash)

OTHER CASE: BP135381 (consee's probate; petnr Steven is pers rep)

FACTS: There is no activity during this acct period.

MATTERS TO CLEAR:

A. No ntc

B. No allegation re names and addresses of persons requesting spec ntc - supp required

C. Ntc bond company deemed required

D. Petnr alleged in his acct filed 1/2/13 the consee died on 8/29/11. Petnr alleges 6/2/12 as d/d in the w/in acct. When did the consee die? - supp required

E. Why isn't the outstanding judgment (117,000) included in the property on hand schedule? - supp required

F. Need atty fee dec addressing factors in CRC Rule 7.702

RELIEF:

1. JTD add'l atty fees, 8,000

2. JTD acct

3. JTD exoneration of bond

o/w atty fees 2,500.00 (allowed), dist of balance to pers rep ok

PA COMMENTS: defer pending clearing of notes

mguayante@lasuperiorcourt.org

MG(11/21/13)(1/15/14)

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION:

RELATED ITEMS: 1014, 1016-1017

Order to be Prepared By     Clerk:     Attorney:

Department    LA    11     Court Convened at:    08:30 AM    01/23/2014

Honorable Michael I. Levanas 

S.L. Williams , Deputy County Clerk     , Deputy Sheriff 

C. Peters, CSR 5667 , Reporter

BP099211       1016     FULLER, EDWINA - CONSERVATORSHIP     

Conservatorship-Pers  

ALLOWANCE OF FEES

Petitioner(s): Fuller, Steven A.  

Attorney(s): Burrell, Sybil Yvonne, Esq.  

Continuance Number: 1     Continuance From: Monday, December 2, 2013

Last Date Changed: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 03:51 PM

Last Note Changed By: MGUAYANT

To clear probate notes "filed documents" must be submitted to Rm 429, within time frames set forth in Rule 4.4 (b) of LASC Rules. You may contact the Probate Attorney or Probate Examiner whose E-Mail address appears at the end of these notes, subject to compliance with all conditions governing the use of Interactive E-Mail. E-mail Rules are available on the Court's web site at www.LASuperiorCourt.org.

PETN FILED 11/1/13

PRIOR ORDERS: Cont to 1/23/14

SUMMARY:

Petnr is former atty for consr

ntc/copy rels, attys ok

SUPP filed 11/26/13

OTHER CASE: BP122665 (spouse, Thelsey Fuller's, probate); BP135381 (consee's probate)

FACTS: Petnr alleges on or about 10/22/10, petnr retained to prosecute consee's claims of interest in her deceased husband's estate. PER SUPP, consrship received 107,692.30 jgmt in its favor.

MATTERS TO CLEAR:

NEW AFTER REVIEW OF SUPP:

D. Supp alleges 147.25 hrs, including payment for paralegal services. Need paralegal dec, addressing factors in CRC 7.703(e). Provide number of atty hrs and number of paralegal hrs as well as paralegal rate

RELIEF:

1. JTD atty fees, 48,950 (per supp) for 147.25 atty & paralegal hrs.

PA COMMENTS: defer pending clearing of notes

mguayante@lasuperiorcourt.org

MG(11/21/13)(1/15/14)

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION:

RELATED ITEMS: 1014-1015, 1017

Order to be Prepared By     Clerk:     Attorney:

Department    LA    11     Court Convened at:    08:30 AM    01/23/2014

Honorable Michael I. Levanas 

S.L. Williams , Deputy County Clerk     , Deputy Sheriff 

C. Peters, CSR 5667 , Reporter

BP099211       1017     FULLER, EDWINA - CONSERVATORSHIP     

Conservatorship-Pers  

ALLOWANCE OF FEES

Petitioner(s):  

Attorney(s): Anderson, Sandra Jones, Attorney a   IN PRO PER

Continuance Number: 3     Continuance From: Monday, December 2, 2013

Last Date Changed: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 03:51 PM

Last Note Changed By: MGUAYANT

To clear probate notes "filed documents" must be submitted to Rm 429, within time frames set forth in Rule 4.4 (b) of LASC Rules. You may contact the Probate Attorney or Probate Examiner whose E-Mail address appears at the end of these notes, subject to compliance with all conditions governing the use of Interactive E-Mail. E-mail Rules are available on the Court's web site at www.LASuperiorCourt.org.

PETN FILED 5/31/13

REVIEWED FROM PETN & IMAGED FILE ONLY

PRIOR ORDERS: Cont to 12/2/13. Cont to 7/16/13

SUMMARY:

Petnr is former atty for consr

FACTS: Petnr began representing former consr, Steven Fuller, on 5/26/06. Services include defending the first acct covering the period 6/1/06 - 10/29/09; issue relating to Prob C 850 petn; work on second acct through (2nd acct filed by consr's current atty; petnr alleges she had not signed a Sub of Atty any time prior to the 2nd acct having been filed). Fees requested cover the period 10/30/09 - 6/15/11 (49.3 hrs at 300/hr).

Categories of services performed:

a. Prep of 1st acct, five supps thereto, responding to objections (8.5 hrs)

b. Two orders on 1st acct (3.9 hrs)

c. Hearings, responses to objections on requests to obtain personnel records of Thelsey Fuller in connection w/consee's c/p interest in Thelsey's retirement benefits (20.8 hrs)

d. Ex parte hearing to secure trial counsel (4.5 hrs)

e. Meetings, correspondence and telephone conferences w/PVP atty (4.6 hrs)

f. Telephone conferences w/clt and siblings (4 hrs)

g. Direction, prep of 2nd acct (1.2 hrs)

h. General matters and misc (1.8 hrs)

MATTERS TO CLEAR:

A. Has petnr included her services re the Prob C 850 petn in any of the above categories (a - h)? If yes, which category and how much time spent? What was the result of the 850 petn? - supp required

B. Provide itemized statement - supp required

**************************************************

OBJECTIONS FILED 6/26/13

OBJECTOR: Steven Fuller

ATTORNEY: Teddie J. Randall

SUMMARY:

Objr is consr

MATTER TO CLEAR:

A. no prf of svc

ARGUMENT: contends request does not comply w/CRC 7.702; description fails to set forth specific tasks performed, making it impossible to determine the reasonableness of fee requested; contends request is excessive.

**************************************************

OBJECTIONS FILED BY ROBERT FULLER AND DORIS FULLER

FILED 7/12/13

ATTY FOR OBJECTORS OLDMAN, COOLEY AND SALLUS

svd 7/11/12

alleges insufficient detail re requested fees

RELIEF:

1. JTD approve the petition for Attorney Fees for services to the Conservatorship by Sandra Jones Anderson and allow attorney fees in the amount of $14,790.00.

2. JTD approve the petition for reimbursement of $161.00 in costs advanced by the attorney Sandra Jones Anderson.

3. JTD approve the recording of an additional lien for $14,790.00 for attorney fees and $161.00 for costs advanced against the real property in the estate of Edwina Fuller commonly known as 1916 Belhaven Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90059 and legally described as Tract No 12999, Lot 79, APN 6134-030-040. Said liens are to be in addition to the two liens recorded on June 21, 2011 as Document No. 20110837469 and Document No. 20110837470 for a total outstanding indebtedness of $56,320.00 due and payable to Sandra Jones Anderson for services to the Conservatorship.

4. JTD allow interest to accrue at the rate of seven percent (7%) per annum from the date of the Orders

until paid.

5. JTD OBJECTIONS: fees be denied or denied in part

6 JTD OBJECTIONS filed 7/12/13 by Robert Fuller and Doris Fuller (ss)

PA COMMENTS: See Prior Orders and remaining notes

mguayante@lasuperiorcourt.org

MG(6/21/13)(7/10)(11/21)(1/15/14)

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION:

RELATED ITEMS: 1014-1016

Order to be Prepared By     Clerk:     Attorney:

These don't stay up long, here:
http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/probatenotes/

Many thanks to the abusers and their attorney for fucking off everything that Thelsey & Edwina worked all of their lives to accomplish and acquire.

The attorneys are the ones that prosper from it.

10 Signs for Spotting a Sociopath

#1) Sociopaths are charming.

#2) Sociopaths are more spontaneous and intense than other people

#3) Sociopaths are incapable of feeling shame, guilt or remorse.

#4) Sociopaths invent outrageous lies about their experiences.

#5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and "win" at all costs.

#6) Sociopaths tend to be highly intelligent, but they use their brainpower to deceive others rather than empower them.

#7) Sociopaths are incapable of love and are entirely self-serving.

#8) Sociopaths speak poetically.

#9) Sociopaths never apologize.

#10) Sociopaths are delusional and literally believe that what they say becomes truth merely because they say it!

Learn more:
http://www.naturalnews.com/036112_sociopaths_cults_influence.html

What Goes on in the Dark

Always Comes to the Light...

LAK, DANIEL KRISTOF - 216983

» New Search

Case List

The attorney you selected has the following cases in the State Bar Court:

Case Number Case Filed 13-O-11189 12/06/2013 13-O-12314 12/06/2013 13-O-14235 12/06/2013

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

9:30 AM, 13-O-11189, Lak Daniel Kristof, Status Conference, Appearance, LA.

http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/calendar/judgeview.aspx?j=148

15 There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man.

16 If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.

17 And when he was entered into the house from the people, his disciples asked him concerning the parable.

18 And he saith unto them, Are ye so without understanding also? Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot defile him;

19 Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?

20 And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man.

21 For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders,

22 Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness:

23 All these evil things come from within, and defile the man.

Mark 7:15-23

Attorney Disbarred For Taking $750,000 From Trust

La Jolla lawyer disbarred for taking more than $725,000 in trust funds

A La Jolla lawyer who once represented the wife of disgraced Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham was disbarred Oct. 28 for misappropriating more than $725,000 from a family trust and partnership. 

JAMES A. MACY [#57677], 64, lost his license for also not complying with a disciplinary order stemming from his admission that he mishandled funds belonging to Nancy Cunningham.

In that case, Cunningham hired Macy to handle a variety of issues arising from her husband’s arrest, including disputes with the IRS and a civil forfeiture action. (Cunningham resigned his seat in Congress in 2005 after pleading guilty to taking more than $2 million in bribes.) Mrs. Cunningham gave Macy $31,000 cash and a check for more than $98,000 to hold until the federal government determined if it had a claim to the funds. In the end, Macy claimed legal fees of more than $158,000.

He was suspended and placed on probation in 2010 after stipulating that he failed to account for or properly maintain client funds and that he placed the cash in his safe rather than in a client trust account.

Read more: 
http://www.calbarjournal.com/January2012/AttorneyDiscipline/Feature.aspx

WOW! 

Trust Asset Listing No Longer Active

The property you are searching for is no longer an active listing.

8625 South 12TH Avenue, Inglewood, CA

$249,000

0 bedrooms

MLS #/Web ID: 13662051

http://www.weichert.com/46722501/

See:

Thelsey S. Fuller Trust (sic) set to lose over $545,800.00