Happy Birthday, There Is No Peace

Mr. Thelsey L. Fuller [Daddy]

02 JUN 1917 - 26 AUG 2009

Mrs. Edwina J. Fuller [Momma]

20 AUG 1917 - 02 JUN 2012

YOUR ABUSERS ARE STILL AT LARGE!

WHO DIDN'T I TELL?

"Runaway Child"

State Isn't Doing Enough To Investigate Elder Abuse

Advocates say state isn’t doing enough to investigate elder abuse

by Alicia Freese | February 1, 2013

The Adult Protective Services (APS) program — the unit charged with investigating allegations of elder abuse — has clawed its way out from under a backlog of hundreds of cases. Susan Wehry, commissioner of the Department of Aging and Independent Living (DAIL), said her department made two key changes to get the caseload under control — it hired additional investigators and it established a financial exploitation unit.

“The crisis is over. We are stable. We have an ace team of investigators,” Wehry told the House Human Services Committee last week.

But advocates attribute the success in whittling down the backlog to something else. They say APS has grown more conservative when making decisions about what warrants an investigation and what constitutes abuse.

That complaint stems from anecdotal evidence and one striking statistic. Vermont’s substantiation rate — the percentage of cases that are deemed to be actual abuse— remains one of the lowest in the nation. The national average is 44 percent, whereas the Vermont average falls somewhere between 8 percent and 10 percent, according APS calculations.

Read more: http://vtdigger.org/2013/02/01/advocates-say-state-isnt-doing-enough-to-investigate-elder-abuse/

I’ve found that elder abuse is not a crime, here’s why…

ELDER ABUSE, WHO DIDN’T I TELL?

California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15610.07 defines “abuse of an elder or dependent adult” as either of the following: (a) physical abuse, neglect, financial abuse, abandonment, isolation, abduction or other treatment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental suffering; or (b) the deprivation by a care custodian of goods or services necessary to avoid physical harm or mental suffering.

http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2010/11/commitment-to-daddy.html

http://vtdigger.org/2013/02/01/advocates-say-state-isnt-doing-enough-to-investigate-elder-abuse/#comment-47832

Pressure Ulcers

The following information was copied verbatim from the AHCPR Guidelines, which is consistent with the recommendations of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) Consensus Development Conference:

Stage 1
Nonblanchable erythema of intact skin, the heralding lesion of skin ulceration. In individuals with darker skin, discoloration of the skin, warmth, edema, induration, or hardness may also be indicators.

A Stage I pressure ulcer is an observable pressure related alteration of intact skin whose indicators as compared to the adjacent or opposite area on the body may include changes in one or more of the following: skin temperature (warmth or coolness), tissue consistency (firm or boggy feel) and/or sensation (pain, itching).

The ulcer appears as a defined area of persistent redness in lightly pigmented skin, whereas in darker skin tones, the ulcer may appear with persistent red, blue, or purple hues.

Stage 2
Partial thickness skin loss involving epidermis, dermis, or both. The ulcer is superficial and presents clinically as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater.

Stage 3
Full thickness skin loss involving damage to or necrosis of subcutaneous tissue that may extend down to, but not through, underlying fascia. The ulcer presents clinically as a deep crater with or without undermining of adjacent tissue.

Stage 4
Full thickness skin loss with extensive destruction, tissue necrosis, or damage to muscle, bone, or supporting structures (e.g., tendon, joint capsule). Undermining and sinus tracts also may be associated with Stage 4 pressure ulcers.

http://www.medicaledu.com/staging.htm

At the time of his death, according to medical records, Mr. Thelsey L. Fuller suffered with all four stages of pressure ulcers over different areas of his body.

Job 24:14, plus Week-End Movie

Job 24:14

"The murderer rising with the light killeth the poor and needy, and in the night is as a thief."

Robert Lewis Fuller and Doris Aleda Fuller a.k.a. how many different names she is known to use... 

Introducing their new attorney:

Paul Kujawsky [2nd Appellate District CA case B241450/2]
Law Offices of Paul Kujawsky
5252 Corteen Place No. 35
Studio City, CA 91607
818.389.5854

Pres. Obama, Gov. Brown & Others... Robert Fuller, Doris Fuller & Others are still at large.

ELDER ABUSE IS A CRIME! 

No it ain't!

Now our week-end movie...

The Long Ships

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057259/

Sidney Poitier, Richard Widmark

Abuser Served Gumbo That Looked Like Feces For Christmas Dinner

http://www.facebook.com/catherine.grant.31

Doris's Christmas Gumbo 2012

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/65185_483505425024958_520047822_n.jpg

IMHO, it looks like shit and probably tasted like shit too.

Would you eat something that looks like this?

Older Americans Are Easy Victims

Tips to avoid, prevent increasing elder abuse

Ric Romero
More: Bio, Facebook, Home Page, News Team

LOS ANGELES (KABC) -- Older Americans are easy victims for scam artists. But increasingly it's trusted family and friends who are abusing the elderly by draining bank accounts, selling valuables or even taking over their real estate. These crimes can often be very difficult to spot.

Seventy-four-year-old Arthur Green spent years building his lakeside home. He says recently he was persuaded to sign it over to his granddaughter and was told he could live out his days there.

"All of a sudden she just like, I don't know what, snap of the fingers, she changed. She got money hungry," said Green.

His granddaughter tried to evict him and sell the property.

"Arthur was absolutely at risk of homelessness," said Denis Culley, a legal services attorney. "He was also completely impoverished because this land and house is the only thing of any value he owned in the world."

READ MORE: http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/consumer&id=8940005

California attorney general's office to ramp up elder-abuse investigations

By Marjie Lundstrom
mlundstrom@sacbee.com

Published: Saturday, Nov. 3, 2012 - 11:00 pm | Page 1A

Until he died last month at age 82, Don Esco of Cameron Park had his own way of measuring the passage of time: by the years, months and days since the death of his wife, Johnnie, after a short stay at a Placerville nursing home.

It was never enough, he always said, to settle a civil lawsuit with the El Dorado Care Center in Placerville, which he blamed for his 77-year-old wife's death in March 2008. No, he said, it was never about the money.

Johnnie's death, he maintained, was a criminal matter...

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/03/4959807/california-attorney-generals-office.html

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/03/4959807/california-attorney-generals-office.html#storylink=cpy

From what I understand about the California Attorney General's Office, the Governor and a lot of other law enforcement offices, agencies... prosecuting elder abuse, financial elder abuse is not what they do!

"Who didn't I tell?"

http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2010/11/commitment-to-daddy.html

Robert L. Fuller, Doris A. Fuller aka Doris Fuller-Stewart aka Ijnanya Fuller and Daniel Kristof Lak -- are still at large for what I believe are:

Various Felony Violations, BP099211, BP118616, BP122665

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT; BP099211, BP118616, BP122665

I believe that the evidence shows that Robert Lewis Fuller, Doris Aleda Fuller and Daniel Kristof Lak may have committed the following felony violations: (1) a violation of Penal Code section 368(d), Financial Elder Abuse, (2) a violation of Penal Code section 487(a), Grand Theft, (3) a violation of Penal Code section 506, Embezzlement by Trustee or Attorney, (4) a violation of Penal Code section 118, Perjury, (5) a violation of Penal Code Section 470-483.5, Fraud, Defraud, Corruption of Records.

California Court of Appeal Case Notification for: B241450

I'm no attorney but, it would appear that the abusers appeals were dismissed per rule 8.140(b).

"The following transaction has occurred in:
Arnold v. Fuller et al.
Case: B241450, 2nd District, Division p

Disposition date (YYYY-MM-DD):        2012-08-24
Disposition description:            Dismissed per rule 8.140(b)
Disposition status as of 2012-08-24:    Final 
Notes:  
Doris Fuller 



For more information on this case, go to:
http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/disposition.cfm?dist=2&doc_id=2015247&q=272131&f=755477954

For opinions, go to the following web site: http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions-slip.htm
Court of Appeal opinions are generally available on the web site by 5 p.m. on the disposition date.  
Unpublished opinions are generally available on the web site by 5�p.m. on the disposition date or 
by 5 p.m. on the court workday following the disposition date. "

Also, Daniel Kristof Lak very well knows that when he filed his clients appeal that the plaintiff and respondent [B241450] is represented by council and that the Converatorship of Edwina Fuller [B241452] is no longer represented by Sandra Anderson but, instead by another attorney.

I believe that what he did in relation to filing his clients appeal is just one more example of his attempts at misdirection and his never ending quest to collect legal fees from his victims and they are too stupid to see it.  Greed can and will do that.

Re: Los Angeles County Superior Court Cases BP099211 & BP122665

Search by Attorney
Last:    Lak
First:    Daniel
Middle:    Kristof

Search by Case Number
B241450
B241452

 http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search.cfm?dist=2

 http://californiawatch.org/dailyreport/lawmakers-push-elder-abuse-reforms-9091

Objection to Lak's Exhibit "A" Case No. BP 135381

To Whom It May Concern,

Any document presented to the Court by Daniel Kristof Lak concerning the case mentioned above or any Court case in Los Angeles Superior Court concerning Mr. & Mrs. Thelsey "L." Fuller and this blog is suspect at best.

This blog is not based on a paper format.

It is Internet based.

Also it is believed that given past history it has been plainly and clearly exposed and explained herein Daniel Kristof Lak's track record er, veracity in respect to some legal documents.

Therefore, anything concerning this blog should only be trusted and considered in its original format, via the Internet.

"Arigatou!"

TENTATIVE DECISION

It must be noted that it was always agreed within the family that if Daddy passed everything belonged to Momma, that if Momma passed everything belonged to Daddy. But, then there was a power grab within the family, Robert being the ring leader thus forcing Momma's conservator to protect her interest.

Page 3 and Page 4 of the decision would like for one to believe that the conservator acted to lay claim to all the property and not for the benefit of the conservatee, going even further to proclaim:

"It was her conservator - not Edwina as a competent person - that did so."

When in reality, everyone in the family and the Court should know that Momma has always suffered from a mental disorder.

OTHER CASES: BP 122665 Thelsey Fuller Trust & BP 118616 Estate of Thelsey Fuller

In regards to the real property on 12th Ave, Inglewood, CA:

"Thelsey was duly served, has had an opportunity to object to the petition and failed to do so."

Probate Notes

Department LA 99 Court Convened at: 10:00:00 AM 5/23/2011

Continuance Number: 18

Honorable Marvin Lager

S.L. Williams , Deputy County Clerk , Deputy Sheriff

S. Baker, CSR 9249 , Reporter

BP099211 303 FULLER, EDWINA - CONSERVATORSHIP

Conservatorship-Pers

DETERMINE OWNERSHIP (PC 850)

The objections were filed five months after Robert and Doris hired Daniel Kristof Lak and three months after Robert and Doris had Mr. Lak draw up the Trust and the Trust Amendment.

Robert and Doris also had Daniel Kristof Lak place the Belhaven Ave property into the Trust after they had Daddy sign the Trust Amendment.

AS ALWAYS, CLICK ON IMAGES TO INCREASE THEIR SIZE IN YOUR BROWSER

Section 259 of the Probate Code. (a) Any person shall be deemed to have predeceased a decedent to the extent provided in subdivision (c) where all of the following apply:

(1) It has been proven by clear and convincing evidence that the person is liable for physical abuse, neglect, or fiduciary abuse of the decedent, who was an elder or dependent adult.
(2) The person is found to have acted in bad faith.
(3) The person has been found to have been reckless, oppressive, fraudulent, or malicious in the commission of any of these acts upon the decedent.
(4) The decedent, at the time those acts occurred and thereafter until the time of his or her death, has been found to have been substantially unable to manage his or her financial resources or to resist fraud or undue influence.
(b) Any person shall be deemed to have predeceased a decedent to the extent provided in subdivision (c) if that person has been convicted of a violation of Section 236 of the Penal Code or any offense described in Section 368 of the Penal Code.
(c) Any person found liable under subdivision (a) or convicted under subdivision (b) shall not (1) receive any property, damages, or costs that are awarded to the decedent's estate in an action described in subdivision (a) or (b), whether that person's entitlement is under a will, a trust, or the laws of intestacy; or (2) serve as a fiduciary as defined in Section 39, if the instrument nominating or appointing that person was executed during the period when the decedent was substantially unable to manage his or her financial resources or resist fraud or undue influence. This section shall not apply to a decedent who, at any time following the act or acts described in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a), or the act or acts described in subdivision (b), was substantially able to manage his or her financial resources and to resist fraud or undue influence within the meaning of subdivision (b) of Section 1801 of the Probate Code and subdivision (b) of Section 39 of the Civil Code.
(d) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) Physical abuse as defined in Section 15610.63 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(2) Neglect as defined in Section 15610.57 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(3) False imprisonment as defined in Section 368 of the Penal Code.
(4) Fiduciary abuse as defined in Section 15610.30 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(e) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the severance and transfer of an action or proceeding to a separate civil action pursuant to Section 801.

What happened to Daddy's original will?

Fuller Decision

Separating the wheat from the chaff ...

Robert L. Fuller and Doris A. Fuller were found to have committed undue influence, fraud and financial elder abuse in the civil cases listed below.

BP 099 211

BP 122 665

In a criminal, case Robert, Doris & Lak have the potential of being found guilty of state and federal charges.

Unfortunately, IMHO, the judge decided to do a separation and distribution of marital assets from the grave.

Daddy knew that Momma was still his wife and that folks is the bottom line. When Daddy had the chance to object to Momma's name being added to the 12th Ave property he did not.

The objections were filed five months after Robert and Doris hired Daniel Kristof Lak and three months after Robert and Doris had Mr. Lak draw up the Trust and the Trust Amendment.

Robert and Doris also had Mr. Lak place the Belhaven Ave property into the Trust after they had Daddy sign the Trust Amendment.

I'm happy but, I'm sad.

Robert and Doris are still free, Mr. Lak still has a license to practice law.

I will post the Court's Decision no later than tomorrow evening along with the letter that I sent to the FBI.

Yeah, I sure would like to know what is in Robert's FBI jacket.

"Knock, Knock, Knock!"

Various Felony Violations, BP099211, BP118616, BP122665

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT; BP099211, BP118616, BP122665

I believe that the evidence shows that Robert Lewis Fuller, Doris Aleda Fuller and Daniel Kristof Lak may have committed the following felony violations: (1) a violation of Penal Code section 368(d), Financial Elder Abuse, (2) a violation of Penal Code section 487(a), Grand Theft, (3) a violation of Penal Code section 506, Embezzlement by Trustee or Attorney, (4) a violation of Penal Code section 118, Perjury, (5) a violation of Penal Code Section 470-483.5, Fraud, Defraud, Corruption of Records.

DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST FROM: benamarine@gmail.com