12 February 2014

CASE NO. BP122665 FULLER TRUST 13 FEB 2014 DEPT. 11 10:00 am


[Abuse of Thelsey L. Fuller (Edwina)]

Re: REPLY TO RESPONSE AND DECLARATION OF SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO PETITION COMPELLING TRUSTEE TO ACCOUNT AND TO REFRAIN FROM DISTRIBUTING TRUST ASSETS PENDING APPEAL

The ALLEDGED family member residing at the 8625 12th Avenue, Inglewood, California property is the daughter of one of the Abusers, Doris Fuller AKA Doris Fuller Stewart (“Doris”), Ijnanya Fuller (“Ijnanya”).  We do not hold creditable Mr. Oldman’s assertion that Doris’s daughter, Ijnanya, would withhold paperwork from her mother regarding the Inglewood Property while in litigation.  Therefore, the assertion that “neither” Doris nor Robert (Abusers) “were aware of the notice to quit” until this week is on its face - false and only serves to mask a primitive attempt to mislead the Court.
       
The Court found that the July 1, 2008 transfer of $235,152.28 from Thelsey L. Fuller (one of their victims) to the Abusers, Robert Fuller (Robert) and Doris “was caused by undue influence and against Thelsey L. Fuller.”

The Court also found that the September 16, 2008 amendment to the Thelsey S. (sic) Fuller Revocable Trust (Trust) dated July 23, 2008 was the result of undue influence and fraud on the part of Robert Fuller and Doris Fuller and against Thelsey L. Fuller (Thelsey).

In addition, the Court ruled that the very “acts” of Robert and Doris constituted ELDER FINANCIAL ABUSE, UNDUE INFLUENCE AND FRAUD against Thelsey L. Fuller.

UPON ADMITTING THELSEY INTO PACIFIC PALMS CONVELESCANT HOSPITAL ROBERT SIGNED PAPER WORK INDICATING THAT THELSEY SUFFERED FROM DIMINISHED CAPACITY. THIS WAS MERE DAYS AFTER ROBERT AND DORIS DROVE THELSEY TO THE BANK AND REMOVED THE MAJORITY OF THELSY’S MONEY FROM THE CITIBANK ACCOUNT. THELSEY ALSO HAD AN ACCOUNT WITH WELLS FARGO. THELSEY’S RETIREMENT PROCEEDS WERE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE CITIBANK ACCOUNT EVERY MONTH JUST AS SOON AS THEY WERE ELECTRONICALLY DEPOSITED. THELSEY’S SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS, PROCEEDS OF WHICH ARE UNACCOUNTED FOR TO THIS DAY.

It is our belief that ROBERT AND DORIS are also guilty of financial elder abuse against “Edwina Fuller,” (Edwina) Thelsey’s wife, by removing all the retirement funds out of Thelsey’s bank accounts.  The Court ordered that the Trust when controlled by Robert to turn over $ $107,692.30 to Edwina as her portion of Thelsey’s retirement.

Doris states in one of her declarations that she often cooked for Edwina.  According to all of Edwina’s caregivers when asked, they do not recall Robert or Doris visiting Edwina to visit let alone cook.  When Robert and Doris did come over it was to remove Thelsey from Steven Fuller’s (Steven) home in July of 2008 while Steven was at work. It is believed that this was done to prevent the Court from having the impression that Thelsey and Edwina, high school sweethearts, husband and wife had reconciled.  If Thelsey and Edwina had reconciled, that would mean that there would be less money for them at the time of eithers death.  Therefore, we believe that Robert and Doris separated them in an attempt to acquire the entire estate. Which is exactly what they did, though Edwina was still living.  Thelsey and Edwina were still married and beginning to hold hands and laugh together again.  Because of this it would be much more difficult for Robert and Doris to manipulate Thelsey into signing over all the assets to them.  Which is exactly and most expeditiously what they did once Thelsey was removed from the home of Steven and Edwina Fuller.  During his time in the home Thelsey acknowledged that Edwina was his wife.

A lot of testimony from Robert and Doris during the trial was not true, THEY PERJURED THEMSELVES.

After removing Thelsey from the home during the next year Robert and Doris would not allow family members to visit. If family, Sandra Arnold (Sandra) and Shirley Ritchey (Carol) were allowed in Doris’s home to visit their father, Thelsey, they were forced to endure extended periods of time waiting on the porch to get in.  Once allowed inside Sandra and Carol were not allowed to visit with Thelsey alone. Thelsey was never allowed to go on outings with them. WHEN ANYONE WOULD TELEPHONE TO SPEAK TO THELSEY THE CALL WAS PLACED ON SPEAKERPHONE. These disgraceful acts are signs of elder abuse.

Just days after Robert and Doris removed the large sum of $235,152.28 from Thelsey’s Citibank account, they dumped him at Pacific Palms Convalescent Hospital in Long Beach, CA against his will and refused to tell their siblings and other family members where he was located until AFTER his death. Over the course of his later years Thelsey always had made it abundantly clear that he did not want to be placed in a convalescent facility. Thelsey had over $400,000.00.

After reviewing Thelsey Fuller’s medical records, it is our belief that Robert and Doris physically neglected him by allowing him to lay in his excrement and body fluids for long hours.  This is the only explanation for him having two III Stage Decubitus Ulcers and one IV Stage Decubitus Ulcer in the middle of his buttock area. Thelsey’s medical conditions were observed and noted by Dr. Vu upon Thelsy entering the facility. Dr. Vu also noted that Thelsey, could benefit from medical treatment to alleviate some of his suffering and Kaiser would pay for it, Robert refused to allow Dr. Vu to treat these conditions.  Dr. Vu noted all of this in the medical record.  Robert’s refusal to allow Thelsey to be treated may have expedited Thelsey’s death, minimally it caused Thelsey more suffering.

It was noted on the medical record that the facility contacted Doris and asked that someone come to visit him because he was experiencing a mental decline.  Doris and Robert noted on his chart that he was to receive no visitors other than them and that Thelsey was not to be resuscitated. These disgraceful and immoral acts had to have caused great emotional strain to Thelsey L. Fuller, left to die without the love of family or treatment for his medical condition.

Thelsey died alone, broke and confused…believing that he had been betrayed and abandoned by his family.

We will live with this memory for the rest of our lives.

THEREFORE, the Court must enforce the Judgment After Trial conformed on March 19, 2012 as stated:

“The trustee of the Fuller Trust shall recover $235,158.28 from ROBERT FULLER and DORIS FULLER aka DORIS FULLER STEWART as individuals for which amounts ROBERT FULLER and DORIS FULLER aka DORIS FULLER STEWART shall be jointly and severally liable.”

































06 NOVEMBER 2010

ELDER ABUSE, WHO DIDN'T I TELL?

[THE ABUSERS ARE STILL AT LARGE]





5 comments:

  1. Attorneys usually protect their own kind and refrain from criticizing each other. Not so the case here:

    "Second, Petitioners have not been represented by Daniel K. Lak, Esq. since November 2012 when he was suspended from practice. Third, Mr. Lak failed to provide Petitioners' file to Petitioners' current attorney..."

    It's a wonder that gleep manages to stay in business--if he is even still in business.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's blood in the water... we wouldn't be surprised if there's a feeding frenzy fairly soon.

      http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx

      "Lak"

      Case No. 13-O-11189; 13-O-12314; 13-O-14235

      See also: http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2013/12/trust-stands-to-lose-in-excess-of.html

      Delete
    2. http://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/Regulation/2013_ComplaintForm-InstructionsENG.pdf

      Fill in the blanks.

      Delete
  2. Not to worry, Steven A. Fuller and his attorney, Teddie J. Randall did not account for $107,692.30 paid to the Estate of Edwina Fuller, BP135381 or in regards to her conservatorship BP099211. But, instead perjured themselves in the accounting they submitted to the Court proclaiming that the accounting was true.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not to worry, Steven A. Fuller and his attorney, Teddie J. Randall did not account for $107,692.30 paid to the Estate of Edwina Fuller, BP135381 or in regards to her conservatorship BP099211. But, instead perjured themselves in the accounting they submitted to the Court proclaiming that the accounting was true.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are reviewed before posting.