29 April 2013

Abuse of the Elderly is Pandemic


Elder abuse
By Philip Chua
1:00 pm | Monday, April 29th, 2013

Elder abuse or abuse of the elderly is a pandemic. It is much more common that we think. This savagery is shameful, disgusting, and against every rule on love, respect, and human decency. It is most unfortunate that while the human race has come a long way from our cavemen years, the caveman mentality and brutality among a few of us still remain. Perhaps I should not even demean our cavemen relatives. Perhaps elder abuse did not even exist in their culture during that time.

Parents would do anything, work hard, sacrifice, and even give up their life, to care for, provide for, protect, and save their children from any danger or calamity. While there are unfortunate exceptions, they are not the rule. Irresponsible and negligent parents are a lot less in proportion compared to children who abuse their parents, especially in their ripe old age, helpless, and dependent on their children, a stage of vulnerability in the winter of their life. Not only don’t they get the care and support they need, they are even abused and neglected. Some even tortured.

Sixty-six percent of the abuses are perpetrated by adult children or spouse; 42 percent of murder victims over 60 were killed by their own children, and 24 percent killed by their spouse.

As far as abuse in the nursing home, 91 percent of nursing homes in the USA are understaffed and therefore not able to provide adequate care. Thirty-six percent are in violation of elder abuse laws.

“Elder abuse, according to World Health organization, is a violation of human rights and a significant cause of illness, injury, loss of productivity, isolation and despair.”

Read more: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/399241/elder-abuse

http://bellaciao.org/en/spip.php?article22601

24 April 2013

14 Signs of Financial Elder Abuse



14 Signs of Financial Elder Abuse

June 3rd, 2010. By 

There are few things we at LawyersandSettlements.com cover that are as heartbreaking as financial elder abuse. The stories about senior citizens who have worked their entire lives to care for family members while ensuring that they, themselves, would be financially stable in their later years—only to have loved ones steal from them—arouse a combination of fury and sadness. The sad truth is that very few incidents of elder abuse are ever reported by the senior, leaving it up to other family members or close friends to figure out what’s going on.Pleading Ignorance copy 14 Signs of Financial Elder Abuse
The sad truth also is that in difficult economic times when many are facing financial hardship, sometimes the “easiest” route to some cash flow can involve the proverbial apple going back to the tree—uninvited. That’s why now, more than ever, it’s important to be aware of the signs of elder abuse and protect those who may be victimized.
This week, Pleading Ignorance examines financial elder abuse, signs it’s occurring and what you can do.
 Financial elder abuse occurs when someone (a loved one, a close friend or even a stranger) preys on a senior citizen and cheats the senior out of money or property. It is a heinous crime and one that goes vastly under reported. The senior may be embarrassed at having been swindled,
Brooke Astor NY Post Cover 14 Signs of Financial Elder Abusemay be afraid of retaliation if the abuser is a family member or caregiver, may be conflicted about reporting a family member to the authorities or may be unable to comprehend that he was, indeed, the victim of a crime. 
Seniors have lost their life savings, their homes, their valued jewelry or other property to abusers. At the same time, the abuser may take advantage of the senior’s condition by providing less care than is necessary or putting the senior in a care home that doesn't meet the senior’s needs. 
I’m fairly certain there’s a special place in hell for those who would do this to their elder family members. But before they get their due from a higher power, there are some signs to be aware of right here, right now, in order to help someone who may be the victim of elder abuse.
In many cases it’s up to family and friends to discover the wrongdoing and file a complaint. In the situation of Brooke Astor, a New York socialite and philanthropist, the victim’s grandson filed a complaint against his father—Astor’s son—alleging that Astor wasn’t being properly cared for even though she could afford a high quality of care. In the end, charges were laid against Astor’s son, he was found guilty and sentenced to time in jail. 
The financial abuse may not have ever been discovered if Astor’s grandson hadn't filed a complaint. 


21 April 2013

Abuser Arrested, stole $6,222 from 89-year-old


ROCK HILL — A York woman has been charged with exploiting a vulnerable adult in Rock Hill after police say she defrauded an elderly man in her care over the course of several months.

Marianne Joan Silvers, 48, of 118 Providence Place, is charged with abuse of a vulnerable adult, according to a Rock Hill Police report. She was arrested Tuesday, but released from jail on a $10,000 personal recognizance bond.

Last month, York County’s office of the Department of Social Services gave Rock Hill Police documents showing that a Bank of America investigator found that 33 checks were cashed in the name of an 89-year-old resident of Park Pointe Village retirement community in Rock Hill, according to a Rock Hill Police report.

Read more here: http://www.heraldonline.com/2013/04/17/4782384/rock-hill-caretaker-accused-of.html#storylink=cpy


This is how abuser are handled in York County, South Carolina...
THEY ARE ARRESTED!


Not so, in Los Angeles County, California...
SEEK A CIVIL REMEDY!


"Who didn't I tell"
http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2010/11/commitment-to-daddy.html

"Follow the MONEY!"
http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2012/08/follow-money.html




17 April 2013

Sheriff Seeks Woman Accused of Elder Abuse


Walnut Sheriff's Station Seeks Woman Accused of Elder Abuse

The alleged crimes happened in Rowland Heights, when officials say the woman took hundreds of thousands of dollars from her elderly father-in-law after his wife died.
By Renee Schiavone


Sheriff's deputies are asking for the public's help in tracking down a Rowland Heights woman who is accused of stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from her father-in-law, selling his home and draining his retirement accounts, officials said Monday.

The 55-year-old woman, identified as Hang Nguyen Vu, is said to be driving a 2012 dark grey Toyota Prius with a California license plate of 6UCU282.

According to sheriff's Sergeant Rich Peña, Vu misappropriated $350,000 from the elderly man.

"Shortly after the elderly victim's wife passed, the suspect began to care for the father-in-law, selling his home and emptying his retirement accounts," Peña said.

Read more: DiamondBar-WalnutPatch

12 April 2013

The Impact of Elder Abuse Hits Hard




I don’t know about you, but when I hear people talking about “impact”, I usually think they’re referring to things bashing into each other like cars, bodies, or heads.  With all of the talk recently about sports and concussions, my mind immediately goes to physical impact.  In our field of elder abuse prevention, there has been a lot of talk about impact lately. It turns out that the impact of elder abuse, even in the absence of any physical bashing, is just as deadly as any crash or concussion.

Just yesterday, results of a Rush University Medical Center study (entitled ‘Elder Abuse as a Risk Factor for Hospitalization in Older Persons’ by XinQi Dong, MD, MPH and Melissa A. Simon, MD, MPH) found that elderly people who suffered psychological abuse, financial exploitation, caregiver neglect, or two or more types of abuse were hospitalized more frequently than those who had not been abused. The annual rate of hospitalization was more than double for those who reported elder abuse than for those who did not.

Earlier work (entitled ‘The Mortality of Elder Mistreatment’) by Lachs and colleagues at Weill-Cornell Medical College in New York had determined that abused elders die at three times the rate of non-abused elders. This held true for elders regardless of the type of abuse or its intensity. The authors noted: “…It seems plausible that experiencing elder abuse is an extreme form of negative social support. In the same manner that social integration reduces mortality, it may conversely be the case that the extreme interpersonal stress resulting from elder abuse situations may confer additional death risk.”



10 April 2013

Former Judge, Attorney Robert Browning Pleads "No Contest" To Elder Abuse Charges











Forest Grove attorney Robert Andrew Browning pleaded no contest in Washington County Circuit Court on Tuesday to 13 counts of first-degree criminal mistreatment.
Before Presiding Judge Kirsten Thompson, Assistant Attorney General Matt McCauley outlined the case against Browning, who has previously been a municipal court judge in North Plains and Gaston.

A grand jury indicted Browning in September after a two-year investigation into the financial exploitation of Browning's mother and former mother-in-law. Browning was charged with 14 counts of first-degree criminal mistreatment; McCauley dismissed one of those counts Tuesday.

Between 2007 and 2009, McCauley said, Browning held power of attorney for both his mother, Josephine "Alice" Browning, and his former mother-in-law, Laura Sullivan. Both women, now deceased, were in residential care facilities at the time and had dementia, McCauley said.

Browning moved money from both women's bank accounts into his own accounts on numerous occasions, McCauley said. The money transfers and withdrawals ranged from $1,000 to $45,000, McCauley said, and Browning spent none of that money on the victims' care. 

Read more: 
http://www.oregonlive.com/forest-grove/index.ssf/2013/04/forest_grove_attorney_robert_b_1.html

See also:
http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2011/09/judge-charged-with-elder-abuse.html

http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2012/09/former-judge-faces-more-charges-in.html

07 April 2013

"I haven't seen that in 40 years." Doris Fuller Stewart






16219 S. Bradfield Ave, Compton, CA - Trust Asset ?



4 Q Ms. Fuller, do you have any original deeds
5 to -- or the original deed or deeds to the property at
6 16219 South Bradfield Avenue in Compton?
7 MR. LAK: We're objecting to that document
8 request on the grounds of relevance.
9 MS. BURRELL: Well, it's -- your objection is
10 noted. But it's listed as an asset on Mr. Fuller's
11 trust, as we'll get to. So I believe --
12 MR. LAK: You can answer the question, Doris.
13 MS. BURRELL: -- it's relevant.
14 THE WITNESS: That is not true. That was a
15 mistake.
16 BY MS. BURRELL:
17 Q Well, we'll get there.
18 MR. LAK: Doris, just answer the question that
19 she's asking.
20 BY MS. BURRELL:
21 Q We'll get there.
22 A Okay.
23 Q I'm just asking for now whether you have a copy
24 of the original deed for that property?
25 A Somewhere.
Page 20

1 Q Okay. Will you look for that and supply me
2 with -- a copy will be fine -- by March 18th, when you
3 supply the rest of the documents?
4 A I'll look.
5 Q Okay.
6 MR. LAK: And just to -- so the witness
7 understands, Doris, she's looking for the original; so
8 it would have to have an original signature.
9THE WITNESS: I haven't seen that in 40
10 years.
11 MR. LAK: Okay.
12 MS. BURRELL: I will accept an original -- as
13 you can see on Item 8, it says an original or a copy if
14 no original is available. A copy would be just fine.
15 MR. LAK: Well, the witness has just stated she
16 hasn't seen the deed for 40 years. So --

I'm thinking if one takes out a reverse mortgage on their property wouldn't they need the deed?

http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2011/03/16219.html



http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2012/10/formal-real-estate-fraud-complaint.html



"This Ain't No Game Show!"

05 April 2013

DECLARATION OF DORIS FULLER


Doris A. Fuller is not a Fuller at all.

"FOLLOW THE MONEY!" $$$



1                         DECLARATION OF DORIS FULLER 

2 I, Doris Fuller, hereby declare:

3     1.     I am an adult child of Edwina Fuller ("Edwina"), the conservatee.

NO YOU AREN'T!


On April 16, 1946 two women gave birth to baby girls. One woman being black and the other woman being white. The black woman gave birth to a white baby and the white woman gave birth to a black baby.  The babies were switched which is why Edwina left Doris at the hospital. Thelsey had to go back to the hospital with his brother to pick up infant Doris. Edwina didn't lay up with a "darky" with kinky hair and big lips let alone get impregnated by one, EVER!   An earlier rape and having her baby stolen, I believe may have been the tipping point and the beginning of Edwina's personal and mental issues.

Oh, and while it's on my mind, according to Edwina - as stated above regarding the rape - Robert Fuller's daddy is white.  She stated that she was dragged into a field and raped by a white man and became pregnant as a result of that rape.  In those days the rapes of black women by white men were not investigated by police.

 I make this

4 declaration on my own personal knowledge and belief and, if called to do so, I could competently

5 testify hereto.

6     2.     I make this declaration in support of my objections to the Second and Final Account

7 and Report of Conservator, petition for Termination, Petition for Attorney and Conservator Fees, and

8 Request for Reimbursement by Steve Fuller ("Steve"), the conservator.

9     3.     During the account period, Edwina was elderly and suffering from dementia. Her

10  monthly food bill is estimated at no more than $250. I often cooked for Edwina so I am familiar with

Circa 2003, would have been the last time Doris was in Steven's home helping with Edwina and when Steven returned home from work it is known that Edwina had been left soiled all day.

11 the amount of groceries she required. Schedule C of the Accounting, however, shows grocery

12 purchases as high as $665 per month. This amount appears excessive for Edwina alone. Steve

13 resided with Edwina during the entire account period. In addition, Steve's niece and his niece's son

14 and son's friend resided in Edwina's residence on a sporadic basis during the account period. Based

15 on the grocery expenditures reflected on Schedule C, it appears that Edwina's funds were used to buy

16 groceries, not just for Edwina, but also for Steve, his niece and her son and son's friend.

Edwina lived with Steven in his residence not the other way around and he worked himself to the bone to make sure that Edwina had the very best of everything that life had to offer including around the clock care.   

"his niece and her son" not "our niece and nephew"?

I strongly suggest that the Court and all interest parties review all reports given by the PVP Attorney, Sibylle Grebe concerning the care of Edwina J. Fuller as provided by Steven Fuller.

Doris Fuller you are a liar, a thief and the truth is not in you. 
http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2013/02/deposition-testimony-of-elder-abuser.html

Tell the Court how you and Robert have failed to give up the Inglewood property, disclose all the information on your home being gifted back to you by Daddy after you took out a reverse mortgage and the condo located at 8707 Falmouth Ave. #308

Yeah, and why is it that Daniel Kristof Lak quit on you? 

17     I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is

18 true and correct.

19      Executed this 28 day of March 2013, at Encino, California.

20                                                                   D~~~~ F~~~~~
                                                                        Doris Fuller
21

22
http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2011/08/stage-iii-stage-iv-pressure-ulcer.html
23

24

25

26

27

28
                                                                                   
                                                DECLARATION OF DORIS FULLER

 Right click to enlarge, left click to open in new tab or window






































































 












04 April 2013

Abusers, early on



































They have yet to give an account as to what they did with the MONEY! that they stole...

Judging by the photo, one could tell they were on their way to greatness one day.


02 April 2013

Thelsey & Edwina's Great-Grand Sons Make it to Golden Gloves Championship


Lancaster, CA
Watts twins 

"FIGHTING CHANCE - Three Antelope Valley boxers advanced to the Golden Gloves State Finals, which will take place Saturday in Lincoln Park.  The three competed in the four-day Golden Gloves Southern California tournament in mid-March.  Pictured, from left to right are Hervi Estrada, chief trainer for AV Boxing Club; Tevin Watts, who finished second at 150 pounds at the SoCal tournament; Jason Morales, who was second at 120 pounds; Kevin Watts, who won the championship at 140 pounds; and Johnny Rosas, Chief trainer for Team Full Force."


Click on image for full size.


29 March 2013

Widely Ignored Crime - ELDER ABUSE


The “Dirty Little Secret” of Elder Abuse

March 28, 2013 07:45:24 am
Americans aged 65 and older are the nation’s fastest growing demographic group, according to the 2010 U.S. Census.  And although crimes committed against the elderly are increasingly a matter of concern, advocates say too little is being done to address the problem.
“It’s the dirty little secret no one wants to talk about,” said Robyn Grant, public policy and advocacy director for the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care in Washington, D.C.
“We’ve got to give it the attention that child abuse and domestic abuse are given in this country.”
In interviews with The Crime Report, experts said one of the key obstacles to dealing with the broad variety of crimes that affect the elderly—ranging from financial fraud to sexual, mental and physical abuse—is the lack of coordination between law enforcement and medical and social service professionals who work with the aged population.  
But this may be changing.
A handful of “elder abuse forensic centers” around the country are pioneering an innovative approach that brings together police, social workers, geriatricians, accountants, psychologists and others who previously tackled the issue from the separate perspectives of their fields.
“By collaborating, we can come up with strategies to really deal with the cases in a more focused way,” says Los Angeles County prosecutor Belle Chen, who supervises the elder abuse unit of the Los Angeles district attorney’s office.
Knowing what I know and seeing what happened in my own family and the response from all of the authorities responsible for responding to criminal elder abuse, criminal financial elder abuse along with the non-response of the DA's office as to combat elder abuse... it's HOGWASH!
They told us to seek a civil remedy.  

It must be noted that the abusers were ordered by the court to repay the Estate of Thelsey L. Fuller in excess of $235,000.00 of which over $107,000.00 belongs to the Estate of Edwina J. Fuller and to turn over all of the real estate and other property belonging to Thelsey L. Fuller over to the Court appointed administrator... which they have failed to perform to this day.  
But, instead Robert L. Fuller and Doris A. Fuller a.k.a. Doris Fuller Stewart have hired new attorneys [Daniel Lak must be running scared] to appeal and object.  Taking further control of the real estate, letting Thelsey's real estate to other, they have continued to disobey or comply with the orders of the Court to this day.  They have also failed to post a bond in order to appeal their judgement but, that hasn't stopped their appeal from moving forward.


Just because the victims have died – Mr.Thelsey L. Fuller and Mrs. Edwina J. Fuller – does not mean that their abusers... Robert L. Fuller, Doris A. Fuller, Daniel K. Lak  & Others should not be brought to Justice.  

As of this writing no criminal charges have been filed.



28 March 2013

Elder Abuse Convictions Upheld



Upheld Astor case convictions underscore elder abuse crime
Mar 26, 2013 2:30 PM
Anthony D. Marshall
A New York appellate court's decision today to uphold most of the 2009 conviction counts against Anthony D. Marshall, charged with defrauding his mother, the late philanthropist Brooke Astor, calls attention to a crime that's growing nationwide: financial elder abuse.

Marshall, 88, will go to jail for one to three years for stealing from his centogenarian mother's multimillion-dollar fortune at a time when she was not physically or mentally competent enough to make her own financial decisions, says a report by the New York Daily News. His lawyers argued unsuccessfully before the Manhattan Appellate Division that someone as old as Marshall should not be subject to prison.

The conviction of Francis Morrissey, an attorney working with Marshall, also was upheld. Morrissey was found guilty of forging Astor's name on a fake will.

Sadly, for every successfully argued case, many other situations involving financial exploitation of elders don't get reported, much less prosecuted. And law-enforcement officials and adult protective services experts say the crime is growing in frequency. In a recent Consumer Reports investigation of financial elder abuse, we discovered a multitude reasons for the tragedy. Often, older people are often ashamed or in denial. Sometimes they are afraid to turn in the perpetrators for fear of retribution. Or, they may not even realize what's being done to them. Saddest of all--and often very hard to identify--are cases in which the person committing the crime is a family member, like Marshall.

Read more: Elder Abuse Conviction Upheld

Siblings Robert L. Fuller and Doris A. Fuller a.k.a. Doris Fuller Stewart, their attorney Daniel K. Lak are still at large.



25 March 2013

Daniel Kristof is a singer



"Chicks dig me, because I seldom wear underwear.  And, when I do it's usually something, unusual...  My name is Daniel Kristof Lak."

http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/216983

Daniel Kristof Lak - #216983

11/26/2012 - Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncompliance Not Eligible To Practice Law

Pending case# 12-O-11263 Stipulation [PDF]
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/12-O-11263-2.pdf

"Who didn't I tell?"
http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2010/11/commitment-to-daddy.html

"FBI Letter"
http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2012/01/fbi-letter-re-thelsey-l-fuller.html

"Fraud, Slander of Real Estate Titles, Conspiracy"



In Memoriam
Mr. & Mrs. Thelsey Leo Fuller (Edwina)


22 March 2013

Judge Charged with Elder Abuse Resigns


East Bay Judge Charged with Elder Abuse Resigns

By Lisa Fernandez  |  Thursday, Mar 21, 2013  |  Updated 2:36 PM PDT

An Alameda County judge charged with stealing thousands of dollars from his Berkeley neighbor, selling her art, and using her garage to store his Thunderbird has resigned and agreed to never be a judge again.

Kathleen Ewins wrote in an email to NBC Bay Area on Thursday that her client, former Judge Paul Seeman, had resigned. He had a "distinguished career," she wrote and "he felt this was an appropriate action to take at this time for the good of the court."

Seeman resigned in exchange for the Commission on Judicial Performance halting its investigation into him, according to the Oakland Tribune. The newspaper reported that he had remained on the bench - and continued to receive a paycheck - while his criminal case proceeded, though he had not appeared in court since his arrest.

Seeman was charged in June 2012 with one count of elder theft and 11 counts of perjury, all felonies, as well as enhancements alleging that he stole at least $200,000. This month, the Tribune reported that the District Attorney amended its complaint, charging Seeman with 20 additional crimes, for a total of 32 counts in all.

Read more: 
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/East-Bay-Judge-Charged-with-Elder-Abuse-Resigns-199430941.html


16 March 2013

Fake "Last Will of Thelsey S. Fuller" [sic]


This is not Mr. Thelsey L. Fuller's original will... period, point blank.

It is a fabrication by Robert L. Fuller, Doris A. Fuller a.k.a. Doris Fuller Stewart and Daniel K. Lak.

Simply put, any legal workings by Daniel K. Lak on behalf of and or for Mr. Thelsey L. Fuller from May 2008 forward are fictitious and do not reflect Mr. Fuller's actual intentions but instead were used to facilitate criminal acts so that his abusers could realize a pecuniary advantage over a sickly 92-year-old man.

Going as far as to say that Mr. Thelsey L. Fuller was not married.  

Testifying in court that Thelsey was married to Odessa Gaines lying right from the start.

Knowing full well that Thelsey and Odessa maintained separate bedrooms as they had from the start of their relationship.

"1.1.  Marital Status.  I am not currently married."













The attorney that drew up Daddy's original Will which would have been put into effect circa 2003 - 2007 -- i.e.,  before Robert, Doris and Daniel K. Lak produced the counterfeit Will below and began committing their various criminal acts... that Will must be brought to the light.

My prayer is that the authorities get off their lazy asses, arrest and prosecute those that committed fraud, theft, undue influence, financial elder abuse, elder abuse and against Mr. Thelsey L. Fuller, Mrs. Edwina J. Fuller and their loved ones.

The news media could help as well by simply questioning the powers that be as to their failure to prosecute this blatant case of criminal elder abuse.

Click on images to increase their size in your browser.



Elder Abuse is a Crime


We believe that the evidence supports that Robert Lewis Fuller, Doris Aleda Fuller, Daniel Kristoff Lak et al. may have committed the following felony violations:


(1) Violation of CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 368-368.5 Special Crimes Against Elders [Criminal Elder Abuse]

(2) Violation of CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 487 Grand Theft

(3) Violation of CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 506 Embezzlement

(4) Violation of CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 118 Perjury

(5) Violation of CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 470-483.5 Forgery, Fraud, Defraud, Corruption of Records.

(6) Violations of various other CALIFORNIA PENAL & CIVIL CODES

"Of all the illegal and illicit enterprises in the world, elder exploitation is among the safest and most profitable."


10 March 2013

Grandmother Found Dead With Maggots In Hair


A South Side woman has been charged with elderly neglect after her malnourished, bedridden (90-year-old) grandmother was discovered dead with maggots in her hair, bed sores, skin ulcers and chemical burns caused by lying in her own urine.

An autopsy conducted by the Cook County Medical Examiner’s office revealed that Cotton died of hypertension, arteriosclerosis and “elder neglect.”

Falls, 40, had power of attorney over Cotton’s matters and routinely cashed the elderly woman’s monthly disability checks...

Read more:
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/03/07/grandmother-found-dead-with-maggots-in-hair-was-victim-of-elder-abuse-prosecutors/

SEE ALSO:
http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2011/08/stage-iii-stage-iv-pressure-ulcer.html

http://benamarine.blogspot.com/2012/08/case-no-bp-135381-objection-to-petition.html


07 March 2013

Special Crimes Against Elders [Criminal Elder Abuse]

PENAL CODE 
SECTION 368-368.5 



368.  (a) The Legislature finds and declares that crimes against
elders and dependent adults are deserving of special consideration
and protection, not unlike the special protections provided for
minor children, because elders and dependent adults may be
confused, on various medications, mentally or physically impaired,
or incompetent, and therefore less able to protect themselves, to
understand or report criminal conduct, or to testify in court
proceedings on their own behalf.
   (b) (1) Any person who knows or reasonably should know that
a person is an elder or dependent adult and who, under
circumstances or conditions likely to produce great bodily harm or
death, willfully causes or permits any elder or dependent adult to
suffer, or inflicts thereon unjustifiable physical pain or mental
suffering, or having the care or custody of any elder or dependent
adult, willfully causes or permits the person or health of the elder
or dependent adult to be injured, or willfully causes or permits the
elder or dependent adult to be placed in a situation in which his or
her person or health is endangered, is punishable by imprisonment
in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine not to exceed
six thousand dollars ($6,000), or by both that fine and
imprisonment, or by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
   (2) If in the commission of an offense described in paragraph (1),
the victim suffers great bodily injury, as defined in Section
12022.7, the defendant shall receive an additional term in the state
prison as follows:
   (A) Three years if the victim is under 70 years of age.
   (B) Five years if the victim is 70 years of age or older.
   (3) If in the commission of an offense described in paragraph (1),
the defendant proximately causes the death of the victim, the
defendant shall receive an additional term in the state prison as
follows:
   (A) Five years if the victim is under 70 years of age.
   (B) Seven years if the victim is 70 years of age or older.
   (c) Any person who knows or reasonably should know that a
person is an elder or dependent adult and who, under
circumstances or conditions other than those likely to produce great
bodily harm or death, willfully causes or permits any elder or
dependent adult tosuffer, or inflicts thereon unjustifiable physical pain
or mental suffering, or having the care or custody of any elder or
dependent adult, willfully causes or permits the person or health of
the elderor dependent adult to be injured or willfully causes or
permits the elder or dependent adult to be placed in a situation in
which his or her person or health may be endangered, is guilty of a
misdemeanor. A second or subsequent violation of this subdivision
is punishable bya fine not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000),
or byimprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by
both that fine and imprisonment.
   (d) Any person who is not a caretaker who violates any provision
of law proscribing theft, embezzlement, forgery, or fraud, or who
violates Section 530.5 proscribing identity theft, with respect to
the property or personal identifying information of an elder or a
dependent adult, and who knows or reasonably should know that the
victim is an elder or a dependent adult, is punishable as follows:
   (1) By a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars
($2,500), or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year,
or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by a fine not exceeding
ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by imprisonment pursuant to
subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for two, three, or four years, or by
both that fine and imprisonment, when the moneys, labor, goods,
services, or real or personal property taken or obtained is of a
value exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars ($950).
   (2) By a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), by
imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that
fine and imprisonment, when the moneys, labor, goods, services, or
real or personal property taken or obtained is of a value not
exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars ($950).
   (e) Any caretaker of an elder or a dependent adult who violates
any provision of law proscribing theft, embezzlement, forgery, or
fraud, or who violates Section 530.5 proscribing identity theft, with
respect to the property or personal identifying information of that
elder or dependent adult, is punishable as follows:
   (1) By a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars
($2,500), or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year,
or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by a fine not exceeding
ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by imprisonment pursuant to
subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for two, three, or four years, or by
both that fine and imprisonment, when the moneys, labor, goods,
services, or real or personal property taken or obtained is of a
value exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars ($950).
   (2) By a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), by
imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that
fine and imprisonment, when the moneys, labor, goods, services, or
real or personal property taken or obtained is of a value not
exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars ($950).
   (f) Any person who commits the false imprisonment of an elder or a
dependent adult by the use of violence, menace, fraud, or deceit is
punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section
1170 for two, three, or four years.
   (g) As used in this section, "elder" means any person who is 65
years of age or older.
   (h) As used in this section, "dependent adult" means any person
who is between the ages of 18 and 64, who has physical or mental
limitations which restrict his or her ability to carry out normal
activities or to protect his or her rights, including, but not
limited to, persons who have physical or developmental disabilities
or whose physical or mental abilities have diminished because of age.
"Dependent adult" includes any person between the ages of 18 and 64
who is admitted as an inpatient to a 24-hour health facility, as
defined in Sections 1250, 1250.2, and 1250.3 of the Health and Safety
Code.
   (i) As used in this section, "caretaker" means any person who has
the care, custody, or control of, or who stands in a position of
trust with, an elder or a dependent adult.
   (j) Nothing in this section shall preclude prosecution under both
this section and Section 187 or 12022.7 or any other provision of
law. However, a person shall not receive an additional term of
imprisonment under both paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision (b) for
any single offense, nor shall a person receive an additional term of
imprisonment under both Section 12022.7 and paragraph (2) or (3) of
subdivision (b) for any single offense.
   (k) In any case in which a person is convicted of violating these
provisions, the court may require him or her to receive appropriate
counseling as a condition of probation. Any defendant ordered to be
placed in a counseling program shall be responsible for paying the
expense of his or her participation in the counseling program as
determined by the court. The court shall take into consideration the
ability of the defendant to pay, and no defendant shall be denied
probation because of his or her inability to pay.


368.5.  (a) Local law enforcement agencies and state law
enforcement agencies with jurisdiction shall have concurrent
jurisdiction to investigate elder and dependent adult abuse and all
other crimes against elder victims and victims with disabilities.
   (b) Adult protective services agencies and local long-term care
ombudsman programs also have jurisdiction within their statutory
authority to investigate elder and dependent adult abuse and
criminal neglect, and may assist local law enforcement agencies in
criminal investigations at the law enforcement agencies' request,
provided, however, that law enforcement agencies shall retain
exclusive responsibility for criminal investigations, any provision of
law to the contrary notwithstanding.