Showing posts with label Mickey Rooney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mickey Rooney. Show all posts

26 November 2012

DANIEL KRISTOF LAK, NOT ELIGIBLE TO PRACTICE LAW


Daniel Kristof Lak is the attorney that represents the alleged abusers of Mr. & Mrs. Thelsey L. Fuller (Edwina).  That abuse has been laid out on this blog.  His clients, Robert Lewis Fuller and Doris Aleda Fuller aka Doris Fuller Stewart were found by the Court to have committed fraud, undue influence, financial elder abuse and were ordered to repay the Estate in excess of $235,000.00 - which they have failed to perform to this day.  Please note that Daniel Kristof Lak was hired by Robert Lewis Fuller and Doris Aleda Fuller to represent Mr. Thelsey L. Fuller in a PC 850 action to determine ownership of property in regards to Edwina J. Fuller's marital rights. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case BP099211.

Child & Family Support Non-Compliance?

Daniel Kristof Lak - #216983
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/216983
Current Status:  Not eligible to practice law (Not Entitled)

11/26/2012Suspended/Child & Fam Supp noncomplianceNot Eligible To Practice Law 

Business and Professions Code section 6125 codifies that:
“No person shall practice law in California unless the person is an active member of the State Bar.” (§6125.)

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
11/26/2012 Not Eligible To Practice Law
Present Not Eligible To Practice Law


We continue to believe that the evidence supports that Robert Lewis Fuller, Doris Aleda Fuller aka Doris Fuller Stewart, Daniel Kristof Lak et al. may have committed the following felony violations:

(1) Violation of CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 368-368.5 
Special Crimes Against Elders

(2) Violation of CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 487 
Grand Theft

(3) Violation of CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 506 
Embezzlement

(4) Violation of CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 118 
Perjury

(5) Violation of CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 470-483.5 
Forgery, Fraud, Defraud, Corruption of Records.

(6) Violation of  various other CALIFORNIA PENAL & CIVIL CODES...

We also believe that Daniel Kristof Lak must be disbarred and his clients, Robert Lewis Fuller and Doris Aleda Fuller aka Doris Fuller Stewart must be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Elder Abuse and Neglect

WARNING SIGNS, RISK FACTORS, PREVENTION, AND HELP


25 November 2012

The Wisdom of Psychopaths


Right off the top, this post is dedicated to Robert Lewis Fuller, Doris Aleda Fuller and their attorney; Daniel Kristof Lak.


"In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a scale of “madness” along which we all sit. Incorporating the latest advances in brain scanning and neuroscience, Dutton demonstrates that the brilliant neurosurgeon who lacks empathy has more in common with a Ted Bundy who kills for pleasure than we may wish to admit, and that a mugger in a dimly lit parking lot may well, in fact, have the same nerveless poise as a titan of industry.

Dutton argues that there are indeed “functional psychopaths” among us—different from their murderous counterparts—who use their detached, unflinching, and charismatic personalities to succeed in mainstream society, and that shockingly, in some fields, the more “psychopathic” people are, the more likely they are to succeed. Dutton deconstructs this often misunderstood diagnosis through bold on-the-ground reporting and original scientific research as he mingles with the criminally insane in a high-security ward...,"


The Wisdom of Psychopaths - Kevin Dutton

"When you hear the word psychopath what do you think of?

Probably some brutal serial killer who is out of his mind. 

Right? 

What if I told you that psychopaths can function at extremely high levels and succeed in all levels of society?"



Only a psychopath would abuse, misuse and rob their parents and believe that they are truly justified by their deeds and not feel a shred of guilt but, instead infinite bravado, charm, ruthlessness, fearlessness, focus, coolness under pressure, a lack of conscience and empathy... very high intelligence.



21 November 2012

You're Shady - Fraud, Slander of Real Estate Titles, Conspiracy


17 DID YOUR FATHER EVER GO TO THE LAW OFFICES OF
18 DANIEL LAK, PHYSICALLY, IN IRVINE?
19 A NO.
20 Q AND WHEN THE TRUST WAS SIGNED JULY 23RD, WHO WAS
21 PRESENT?
22 A IT WAS YOU [LAK], MS. FIONA, THE OTHER LADY

Page 30 Testimony of Doris Fuller.

DANIEL KRISTOF LAK’S SPECIFIC
DENIALS TO COUNTS ONE AND TWO,
AND OBJECTION TO NOTICE OF
DISCIPLINARY CHARGES
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/12-O-11263-1.pdf

What other lady? [Judith Lisa Eisenstein???] 

8707 FALMOUTH AVE, #308
Playa Del Rey, CA.

Condo 8707 Falmouth Avenue, Unit: 308 
Buyer: Judith Lisa Eisenstein (Trustee), Thelsey S Fuller (Trustee) (Revocable Trust), Thelsey S Fuller, James Matthew and Judith Lisa Eisenstein Keenan (Revocable Trust) (Trustee) and James Matthew Keenan 
Seller: Judy Lisa Eisenstein and Thelsey S Fuller



















Conspiracy to Commit Fraud, Elder Abuse, Financial Elder Abuse, Undue Influence, Theft

Alledged THELSEY L. FULLER - Documents, Fiona Cherrie - Notary



16 Q AND THEN ON THE 23RD OF JULY, YOUR FATHER
17 EXECUTED HIS LIVING TRUST, DIDN'T HE?
18 A I BELIEVE SO, YES.
19 Q AND WHEN HE EXECUTED THAT LIVING TRUST, HE WAS
20 AT YOUR SISTER DORIS' HOUSE IN COMPTON, WASN'T HE?
21 A YES.
22 Q AND DORIS WAS PRESENT, WASN'T SHE?
23 A YES.
24 Q AND YOU WERE PRESENT, WEREN'T YOU?
25 A YES.
26 Q AND WHO ELSE WAS PRESENT?
27 A IT WAS MR. LAK, I THINK A NOTARY PUBLIC, AND A
28 SECRETARY. I BELIEVE IT WAS A SECRETARY.


1 Q AND MR. LAK WAS HIS ATTORNEY AT THAT TIME,
2 WASN'T HE?
3 A YES.
4 Q AND THEN ABOUT A MONTH AND A HALF LATER, ON
5 SEPTEMBER 16TH OF 2008, YOUR FATHER AMENDED HIS LIVING
6 TRUST, DIDN'T HE?
7 A YES.
8 Q AND HE EXECUTED AN AMENDMENT AT DORIS' HOUSE,
9 DIDN'T HE?
10 A YES.
11 Q AND DORIS WAS PRESENT?
12 A YES.
13 Q AND YOU WERE PRESENT?
14 A YES.
15 Q AND MR. LAK WAS PRESENT?
16 A YES.
17 Q WAS ANYONE ELSE PRESENT?
18 A HIS NOTARY

From the Testimony of Robert Fuller 2011 May 24, Pages 3 - 4

Why are Robert & Doris still in control of Trust Assets?

8625 S. 12th Avenue, Inglewood, CA. 90305

Why hasn't law enforcement or the Court  removed Doris & Robert's squatters from the Trust Asset? 

FULLER DECISION 


09 September 2012

Real Estate Fraud, Forgery, Hiding of Trust Assets???


"THIS IS A BENAMARINE.BLOGSPOT.COM PRESS RELEASE!"

Page 27 of the "S" Trust reflects that Daddy's "Interest in the real property located at 8625 S.12th Street (sic), Inglewood, CA 90305" on line # 3 but, he list 16219 S. Bradfield Ave differently on line # 1?

The Bradfield Ave property was completely in the "S" Trust but, only what Daddy believed to be his portion of 12th Ave was included in the "S" Trust.

However, Belhaven Ave wasn't included in the "S" Trust at all!!!   (See images below.)

Belhaven Ave. was later recorded with the county recorder as being "L" Trust property by the ABUSERS on 31 December 2008!!!

That said, did Daddy give 50% of the Inglewood property and 100% of Belhaven Ave to his wife, Edwina by default via the Trust document???

Why didn't  Daddy list or mention the Belhaven Ave. or the Falmouth Ave. properties in the Trust???

The truth concerning 8707 Falmouth Ave #308 has yet to be determined but, Ms. Eisenstein has admitted that she knows Daniel K. Lak.

http://losangeles.blockshopper.com/search?ref=sections%23index&q=Thelsey

The Trust was done July 23, 2008 which was prior to Daddy gifting Doris her own home as recorded on October 21, 2008.

Then there’s the $55,000.00 cash withdrawal on August 1, 2008?  "Follow the MONEY!"

So, the question remains… How and when did Daddy become owner of Doris's home on Bradfield and the condo on Falmouth in Playa Del Rey?

Then there is the question of the validity of Daddy's signature on the Trust and other documents.

I would really love to compare Daddy's signature to Lak's documents with Daddy's driver's license and any checks Daddy would have signed on his checking account prior to the advent of Daniel K. Lak circa July 2008.  As all I have to go by and take as accurate is the signature on the power of attorney Daddy signed on May 1, 2008 at the bank with Aunt Carol.


There is no Testimony of Thelsey L. Fuller.  Robert L. Fuller, Doris A Fuller & Daniel K. Lak saw to that and the court allowed it.

Continuance, continuance, continuance, after continuance ruled the day.  Mr. Thelsey L. Fuller was never allowed to be asked or answer one question in open court regarding his wife - Mrs. Edwina J. Fuller, himself or his assets.

"Thelsey S. Fuller Trust"  "Thelsey L. Fuller Trust" it's so very confusing!!!





Re: Los Angeles County Superior Court Cases
BP099211, BP122665, BP118616, BP135381

2nd District Court of Appeal
B241450 & B241452

Judge Marvin Lager, found Robert and Doris Fuller guilty of fraud, undue influence and elder abuse - all in probate court.  They were removed as trustees of the Estate of Thelsey L. Fuller and court ordered to turn over all paperwork and monies that were stolen out of the Trust ($235,000.00 - $107,000.00 of which belonged to our mother - who was alive at the time).  Immediately, Robert and Doris placed Doris Fuller's daughter inside the real property (8625 12th Ave, Inglewood, CA) in which they no longer were trustees or had control over.  

Also, Robert Fuller said that he wasn’t going to pay  Momma, "SHIT!”  

So much for the orders given by Judge Lager. 

So much for the orders of the Court.


My hat goes off to Det. Gomez of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department for her efforts to get justice for the victims, Mr. & Mrs. Thelsey L. Fuller.

Right click on images to increase their size using your browser.














13 July 2012

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY



Here is a question that I would like to have  answered by the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office:

What exactly does it take for the DA's office to file criminal charges in cases of Elder Abuse, Financial Elder Abuse, Fraud and Undue Influence once these crimes have been found to have occured in a civil trial?

Los Angeles County Superior Court Cases
BP099211, BP122665, BP118616, BP135381
Court Hears Actor Mickey Rooney's Allegations of Elder Abuse




12 September 2011

S.462 -- Elder Abuse Victims Act of 2011 (Introduced in Senate - IS)



God willing, "We the people . . . " will get there!

Bill Text
112th Congress (2011-2012)
S.462.IS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.462 -- Elder Abuse Victims Act of 2011 (Introduced in Senate - IS)


S 462 IS

112th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. 462To better protect, serve, and advance the rights of victims of elder abuse and exploitation by establishing a program to encourage States and other qualified entities to create jobs designed to hold offenders accountable, enhance the capacity of the justice system to investigate, pursue, and prosecute elder abuse cases, identify existing resources to leverage to the extent possible, and assure data collection, research, and evaluation to promote the efficacy and efficiency of the activities described in this Act.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

March 2, 2011
Mr. KOHL (for himself, Mr. CASEY, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Ms. MIKULSKI, and Mr. BROWN of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A BILL
To better protect, serve, and advance the rights of victims of elder abuse and exploitation by establishing a program to encourage States and other qualified entities to create jobs designed to hold offenders accountable, enhance the capacity of the justice system to investigate, pursue, and prosecute elder abuse cases, identify existing resources to leverage to the extent possible, and assure data collection, research, and evaluation to promote the efficacy and efficiency of the activities described in this Act.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Elder Abuse Victims Act of 2011'.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act--

(1) the terms `abuse', `elder', `elder justice', `exploitation', and `neglect' have the meanings given those terms in section 2011 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397j);

(2) the term `elder abuse' includes neglect and exploitation;

(3) the term `Director' means the Director of the Office appointed under section 3(b);

(4) the term `Office' means the Office of Elder Justice established under section 3(a);

(5) the term `State' means each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any other territory of possession of the United States; and

(6) the term `task force' means a multidisciplinary task force on elder justice established or designated under section 5(c)(1).

SEC. 3. OFFICE OF ELDER JUSTICE.

(a) In General- There is established within the Department of Justice a office to be known as the Office of Elder Justice, which shall address issues relating to elder abuse.

(b) Director- The Office shall be headed by a Director who shall--

(1) be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, from among individuals with experience and expertise in elder abuse; and

(2) serve as counsel to the Attorney General on elder justice and elder abuse.

(c) Responsibilities- The Director shall--

(1) create, compile, evaluate, and disseminate materials and information, and provide the necessary training and technical assistance, to assist States and units of local government in--

(A) investigating, prosecuting, pursuing, preventing, understanding, and mitigating the impact of--

(i) physical, sexual, and psychological abuse of elders;

(ii) exploitation of elders, including financial abuse and scams targeting elders; and

(iii) neglect of elders; and

(B) assessing, addressing, and mitigating the physical and psychological trauma to victims of elder abuse;

(2) collect data and perform an evidence-based evaluation to--

(A) assure the efficacy of measures and methods intended to prevent, detect, respond to, or redress elder abuse; and

(B) evaluate the number of victims of elder abuse in each State and the extent to which the needs of the victims are served by crime victim services, programs, and sources of funding;

(3) publish a report, on an annual basis, that describes the results of the evaluations conducted under paragraphs (1) and (2), and submit the report to each Federal agency, each State, and the Committee on the Judiciary and the Special Committee on Aging of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives;

(4) evaluate training models to determine best practices, create replication guides, create training materials, if necessary, for law enforcement officers, prosecutors, judges, emergency responders, individuals working in victim services, adult protective services, social services, and public safety, medical personnel, mental health personnel, financial services personnel, and any other individuals whose work may bring them in contact with elder abuse regarding how to--

(A) conduct investigations in elder abuse cases;

(B) address evidentiary issues and other legal issues; and

(C) appropriately assess, respond to, and interact with victims and witnesses in elder abuse cases, including in administrative, civil, and criminal judicial proceedings;

(5) conduct, and update on a regular basis, a study of laws and practices relating to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation, including--

(A) a comprehensive description of State laws and practices;

(B) an analysis of the effectiveness of State laws and practices, including--

(i) whether the State laws are enforced; and

(ii) if enforced--

(I) how the State laws are enforced; and

(II) how enforcement of the State laws has effected elder abuse within the State;

(C) a review of State definitions of the terms `abuse', `neglect', and `exploitation' in the context of elder abuse cases;

(D) a review of State laws that mandate reporting of elder abuse, including adult protective services laws, laws that require the reporting of nursing home deaths or suspicious deaths of elders to coroners or medical examiners, and other pertinent reporting laws, that analyzes--

(i) the impact and efficacy of the State laws;

(ii) whether the State laws are enforced;

(iii) the levels of compliance with the State laws; and

(iv) the response to, and actions taken as a result of, reports made under the State laws;

(E) a review of State evidentiary, procedural, sentencing, choice of remedies, and data retention issues relating to elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation;

(F) a review of State fiduciary laws, including law relating to guardianship, conservatorship, and power of attorney;

(G) a review of State laws that permit or encourage employees of depository institutions (as defined in section 3(c)(1) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(c)(1)) and State credit unions (as defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752)) to prevent and report suspected elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation;

(H) a review of State laws used in civil court proceedings to prevent and address elder abuse;

(I) a review of State laws relating to fraud and related activities in connection with mail, telemarketing, the Internet, or health care;

(J) a review of State laws that create programs, offices, entities, or other programs that address or respond to elder abuse; and

(K) an analysis of any other State laws relating to elder abuse; and

(6) carry out such other duties as the Attorney General determines necessary in connection with enhancing the understanding, prevention, detection, and response to elder abuse.

SEC. 4. DATA COLLECTION.

The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall, on an annual basis--

(1) collect from Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies and prosecutor offices statistical data relating to the incidence of elder abuse, including data relating to--

(A) the number of elder abuse cases referred to law enforcement agencies, adult protective services, or any other State entity tasked with addressing elder abuse;

(B) the number and types of cases filed in Federal, State, and local courts; and

(C) the outcomes of the cases described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) and the reasons for such outcomes;

(2) identify common data points among Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies and prosecutor offices that would allow for the collection of uniform national data;

(3) publish a summary of the data collected under paragraphs (1) and (2);

(4) identify--

(A) the types of data relevant to elder abuse that should be collected; and

(B) what entity is most capable of collecting the data described in subparagraph (A); and

(5) develop recommendations for collecting additional data relating to elder abuse.

SEC. 5. ELDER VICTIMS GRANT PROGRAM.

(a) In General- The Director may make grants and provide technical assistance to not more than 15 States to assist the States in developing, establishing, and operating programs designed to improve--

(1) the response to cases of elder abuse in a manner that limits additional trauma to the elder victims; and

(2) the investigation and prosecution of cases of elder abuse.

(b) Eligibility- A State is eligible to receive a grant under this section if the State--

(1) has a crime victims compensation program that meets the criteria described in section 1403(b) of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10602(b)); and

(2) is in compliance with subsection (c).

(c) Establishment of Task Force-

(1) IN GENERAL- In order to be eligible to receive a grant under this section, a State shall establish or, subject to paragraph (5), designate a multidisciplinary task force on elder justice that is composed of professionals with knowledge and experience relating to the criminal justice system and issues of elder abuse.

(2) MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENT- Except as provided in paragraph (6), a task force shall include--

(A) representatives from law enforcement agencies, such as police officers, sheriffs and deputy sheriffs, detectives, public safety officers, corrections officers, investigators and victims' service personnel;

(B) a representative from the crime victim compensation program of the State;

(C) judicial and legal officers, including individuals who work on cases of elder abuse;

(D) elder justice and elder law advocates, including local agencies on aging and local public and private agencies and entities relating to elder abuse and other crimes against elders;

(E) health and mental health professionals;

(F) representatives from social services agencies in the State;

(G) representatives from adult protective services; and

(H) family members of victims of elder abuse.

(3) REVIEW AND EVALUATION- A task force shall--

(A) review and evaluate the investigative, administrative, and judicial responses to cases of elder abuse in the State;

(B) make recommendations to the State based on the review and evaluation conducted under subparagraph (A), including recommendations relating to--

(i) modifying the investigative, administrative, and judicial response to cases of elder abuse, in a manner that--

(I) reduces the additional trauma to the elder victim; and

(II) ensures procedural fairness to the individual accused of elder abuse; and

(ii) experimental, model, and demonstration programs for testing innovative approaches and techniques that may improve the rate of successful prosecution or enhance the effectiveness of judicial and administrative action in elder abuse cases, and which ensure procedural fairness to the accused, including a determination of which programs are most effective; and

(C) submit the recommendations described in subparagraph (B) to the Office.

(4) REPORT- Not later than 1 year after a State receives grant funds under this section, the State shall submit to the Director a report that includes--

(A) an evaluation of the effectiveness of the grant program;

(B) a list of all laws of the State relating to elder abuse; and

(C) any other information the Director may require.

(5) TASK FORCE ALTERNATIVE- If determined appropriate by the Director, a State may designate a commission or task force established by a State before January 1, 2011, with membership and functions comparable to those described in paragraphs (2) and (3), as a task force for the purposes of this subsection.

(6) TASK FORCE MEMBERSHIP WAIVER- The Director may waive, in part, the task force membership requirements under paragraph (2) for a State that demonstrates a need for the waiver.

(d) Use of Funds- Grant funds awarded under this section may be used to support--

(1) State and local prosecutor offices and courts in elder abuse matters, including--

(A) hiring or paying salary and benefits for employees and establishing or implementing units designated to work on elder justice issues in State prosecutors' offices and State courts; and

(B) hiring or paying salary and benefits for an employee to coordinate elder justice-related cases, training, technical assistance, and policy development for State and local prosecutors and courts;

(2) State and local law enforcement agencies investigating cases of elder abuse; and

(3) adult protective services.

(e) Evaluation and Report- Not later than 1 year after the date on which the Director makes available the final funds awarded under a grant under this section, the Director shall--

(1) evaluate the grant program established under this section; and

(2) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the evaluation conducted under paragraph (1), including recommendations on whether the grant program should be continued.

SEC. 6. ELDER JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL.

Section 2021(b)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397k(b)(1)(B)) is amended by striking `(or the Attorney General's designee)' and inserting `(or the Director of the Office of Elder Justice)'.

SEC. 7. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 through 2014.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.462:



















































dilatory

\DIL-uh-tor-ee\ , adjective;

1.
Tending to put off what ought to be done at once; given to procrastination.

2.
Marked by procrastination or delay; intended to cause delay; -- said of actions or measures.

Word of the Day dictionary.com 12 SEP 11



Financial Elder Abuse Costs Nearly $3 Billion a Year


The MetLife Study of Elder Financial Abuse: Crimes of Occasion, Desperation, and Predation Against America’s Elders further illuminates the widening problem of elder financial abuse.

The full report may be reviewed here:

http://www.metlife.com/assets/cao/mmi/publications/studies/2011/mmi-elder-financial-abuse.pdf

See also: http://www.MatureMarketInstitute.com

It can also be ordered by writing to:

MetLife Mature Market Institute
57 Greens Farms Road
Westport, CT 06880

Financial abuse can take many forms. The National Council on Aging says to watch for these signs of financial abuse:

• The elderly person’s living conditions are well below his or her financial resources;

• Unusual or inappropriate bank account activity is occurring;

• Frequent checks for “cash” are written to a caregiver, financial professional or other;

• Bills go unpaid or are overdue, when someone is supposed to be paying them;

• The elderly person transfers title of his or her home, or other assets,
without reason;

• Large, frequent gifts are made to a caregiver, or other;

• The elderly person is reluctant to talk about once-routine topics;

• Personal belongings are missing;

• Someone attempts to isolate the elderly person from others;

• Changes are made in a will, banking arrangement or professional relationship;

• The elderly person takes out large, unexplained loans;

• A live-in caregiver refuses to leave or is evasive about financial arrangements.

Frequently, the victim will be ashamed. If a family member raises a financial issue, the elderly person may awkwardly try to change the subject. Often, when financial abuse has occurred, it may be too late to report a crime; the perpetrator has absconded. If the abuser is a family member, the elder will often refuse to sign a complaint.

Financial Elder Abuse Costs Nearly $3 Billion a Year