Steven A. Fuller & Teddie J. Randall got away with it Re: BP135381

Fraud, Perjury, Theft, Misappropriation, Embezzlement 

BP135381

08/12/2015 at 01:30 pm in Department 5, Maria E. Stratton, Presiding
FNL ACT/FEES/EXTRA FEES & DIST 

JTD 1 APPROVED [Fraudulent accounting, embezzlement, theft, misappropriation, perjury]
JTD 2 APPROVED [Steven Bain aka Steven Fuller & Randall $3,065.00]
JTD 3 DENIED [No more MONEY! for Randall]
JTD 4 DENIED [No more MONEY! for Steven]
JTD 5 OVER RULED [Probate Court run amok; It's okay to lie & steal]
JTD 6 SUSTAINED [Atty Sandra Anderson gets her MONEY!]
Petition granted

1. JTD account, report
2. JTD statutory commissions & attorneys fees $3,065
3. JTD extraordinary attorney's fees $12,845 (30.10 hrs)
4. JTD extraordinary commissions $1,000
5. JTD objections by Sandra Arnold: 

a) that the court order Steven Fuller and atty Teddie J. Randall to account for the $107,692.30 paid to the Estate of Edwina Fuller by the Estate of Thelsey L. Fuller and to deposit same into a blkd account along with any other monies belonging to the Estate of Edwina Fuller;

b) that the court order that any monies not accounted for and or produced by Steven Fuller and atty Teddie J. Randall be held against them; that they be jointly and severally liable for all missing monies and that those missing monies be recovered from any fees claimed by them against the Estate of Edwina Fuller; 

c) that the court reject and deny the 1st and Final Rept and Acct, as well as any and all acts and proceedings of the admr; 

d) that the court deny any payments to Steven Fuller, Teddie J. Randall and Randall & Associates or any other creditor until such time as a proper and accurate accounting is conducted and then reviewed by the court and all parties involved; 

e) that the court deny the proposed distribution; 

f) that the court find that Steven Fuller and atty Teddie J. Randall attempted to mislead the court, are in contempt of court and committed perjury in regards to the accounting; 

g) that the court find that atty Randall, after being notified of the objections to the sale of the Belhaven Ave. property below fair market value, failed to oppose the safe of the Belhaven Ave. property causing a financial loss to his clients, Shirley Ritchey and Sandra Arnold in regards to the Thelsey L. Fuller Trust in the amount of $20,875; 

h) that the court find that atty Randall has a conflict of interest in the various court cases, BP09921 et. al; 

i) that the court consider the complaint filed against atty Randall with the State Bar, inquiry #14 18164 [pending] for his failure to provide adequate legal representation to his client(s) Sandra Arnold and Shirley Ritchey but, instead provided legal services geared mainly to benefit the designs of Steven Fuller thus causing a financial loss to all less Steven Fuller; 

j) that the court consider Exhibits 1-12 attached to the objs as background info as to the objs and the allegations contained in the objs when making its determination as to the distribution 

k) that the Court force Steven Fuller, admr, to give an accounting for the alleged life insurance policy of Edwina Fuller

5. JTD Sandra Arnold's amendment to objs filed 5/1/15: That the court revisit, rescind and or revise the award of $124,700 to claimant/petitioner, Steven Fuller, also known as Steven A. Fuller

6. JTD objections of petnr's former attorney Sandra Jones Anderson: a) an Order directing Steven Fuller as the former consr of the estate of Edwina Fuller, and now the admr of the estate of Edwina Fuller to pay to Sandra Jones Anderson, former attorney for the cshp of Edwina Fuller, the sum of $14,951 for attorney fees and $161.00 for costs advanced by objr for her services to the cshp of Edwina Fuller in Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BP 099211, pursuant to the 11/18/14 Order of the Court

http://elderabuseexposed.com/victim-stories/corrupt-california-probate-court-judges/

http://www.uglyjudge.com/ugly-government/california/los-angeles/los-angeles-county-superior-court-probate-division/

---

---

---

You got away with it. [FOR NOW]

It was a fuck fest. 

Thelsey & Edwina's family got humped by the bastard with the help of the Court, and the various corrupt attorneys.

The L. A. Probate Court is a sham but, you scumbags already knew that.

This goes out to all the low-lifes, you know who you are.

Financial Abuse

Elder financial abuse spans a broad spectrum of conduct, including:

• Taking money or property
• Forging an older person's signature
• Getting an older person to sign a deed, will, or power of attorney through deception, coercion, or undue influence
• Using the older person's property or possessions without permission
• Promising lifelong care in exchange for money or property and not following through on the promise
• Confidence crimes ("cons") are the use of deception to gain victims' confidence
• Scams are fraudulent or deceptive acts
• Fraud is the use of deception, trickery, false pretence, or dishonest acts or statements for financial gain
• Telemarketing scams. Perpetrators call victims and use deception, scare tactics, or exaggerated claims to get them to send money. They may also make charges against victims' credit cards without authorization

Who are the perpetrators?

Family members, including sons, daughters, grandchildren, or spouses. They may:

• Have substance abuse, gambling, or financial problems
• Stand to inherit and feel justified in taking what they believe is "almost" or "rightfully" theirs
• Fear that their older family member will get sick and use up their savings, depriving the abuser of an inheritance
• Have had a negative relationship with the older person and feel a sense of "entitlement"
• Have negative feelings toward siblings or other family members whom they want to prevent from acquiring or inheriting the older person's assets

Predatory individuals who seek out vulnerable seniors with the intent of exploiting them. They may:

• Profess to love the older person ("sweetheart scams")
• Seek employment as personal care attendants, counselors, etc. to gain access
• Identify vulnerable persons by driving through neighborhoods (to find persons who are alone and isolated) or contact recently widowed persons they find through newspaper death announcements
• Move from community to community to avoid being apprehended (transient criminals)

Unscrupulous professionals or businesspersons, or persons posing as such. They may:

• Overcharge for services or products
• Use deceptive or unfair business practices
• Use their positions of trust or respect to gain compliance                                                                          

LEARN MORE:

http://www.preventelderabuse.org/elderabuse/fin_abuse.html

BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY & FRAUD

Breach of fiduciary duty commonly falls under the following three categories:

1. Breach of reasonable care (negligence) [CACI 4101];

2. Breach of duty of loyalty [CACI 4102] ; and/or

3. Breach of confidentiality [CACI 4103].

Of course, intentional wrongs such as fraud (fiduciary fraud) as well as negligent misrepresentation also constitute a breach of fiduciary duty.

The elements of a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty are:

(1) Duty: Existence of a fiduciary duty;

(2) Breach: The breach of that duty; and

(3) Causation of Damages: Damage proximately caused by that breach.

 Mosier v. Southern California Physicians Insurance Exchange (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1022, 1044.

Note: In certain cases, punitive damages may be available in specifically defined egregious cases (Hobbs v. Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Incorporated (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 174). 

But attorney’s fees are not generally recoverable in breach of fiduciary causes of action (Allstate Insurance Co. v. Superior Court (2007) 151 Cal. App. 4th 1512, 1528).  The measure and types of damage relief available in breach of fiduciary claims depend on the nature of the breach.

Because breach of fiduciary duty is a hybrid of a contract and tort action, courts sometimes modify, and/or vary in their interpretations of issues such as, for example, damages and the statute of limitations.

Fiduciary California

FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION LAW IN CALIFORNIA

California law allows persons to recover damages for intentional fraud as well as negligent misrepresentations if certain elements are sufficiently plead and proved.

WHAT IS FRAUD?

Fraud is using deceit or dishonest means for the purpose of depriving another of money, property or a legal right.

This article discusses types of fraud, pleading and proving the elements thereof.

TYPES OF CIVIL TORT FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION:

Intentional fraud and deceit occur when the perpetrator uses deceit (false important facts) to convince the victim to rely on the false facts.  Then the victim reasonably relied on and was harmed by the deceit.

Promissory fraud occurs when the perpetrator makes a promise that is important to the transaction that he or she never intends to (and never does) perform, in order to induce the victim to rely victim rely on the promise.  Then the victim must reasonably rely on and be harmed by the false promise.

Compare breach of contract where a party makes a genuine promise but later breaks the promise.

Concealment fraud occurs when there is a fiduciary or other relationship between the parties where there is a duty of full disclosure. The concealing person, with an intention to deceive, does not disclose important facts that the concealing person knows but the victim does not and could not know. Further, the victim reasonably relied on and was harmed by the concealment.

Embezzlement: “Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom it has been intrusted [entrusted]” (Criminal CA Penal Code Section 503).  From the civil relief standpoint, embezzlement may create various causes of action such as, for example, conversion (wrongful taking of property), fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty.

Constructive fraud (negligent misrepresentation) occurs when the perpetrator misrepresents to the victim that an important false fact is true.  But the perpetrator may have honestly believed that the false representation is true.  Yet, the perpetrator had no reasonable grounds for believing the representation was true when he or she made it; and he or she intends that victim rely on the representation.  The victim must reasonably rely on and be harmed by the false representation.

Civil fraud, deceit and misrepresentation are defined in Civil Code Sections 1709, 1710, 1572 and 1573.

Fraud, Deceit & Misrepresentation

Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when one makes representation with intent to deceive and with the knowledge that it is false. An action for fraudulent misrepresentation allows for a remedy of damages and rescission.

$107,692.30 <----- click here

See; link is below:

Case Number:  BP099211
FULLER, EDWINA – CONSERVATORSHIP
Case Taken Under Submission August 11, 2015

Case Number:  BP135381
FULLER, EDWINA - DECEDENT
Case Taken Under Submission August 12, 2015

http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/

STEVEN FULLER aka Steven Bain vs THELSEY FULLER

Steven Fuller aka Steven Bain various Court Sases in regards to his alleged dad, Thelsey Fuller.

Los Angeles County Superior Court
BP099211, BP122665, BP118616, BP135381

If we would have known then what we know now, Steven would have not be able to savage the family and destroy everything that our parents worked their entire lives to accomplish. 

He definitely would not have been able to take advantage of his victims in all of this, namely: Thelsey L. Fuller; Edwina J. Fuller; Shirley C. Ritchey; and Sandra J. Arnold.

It must be noted that Steven had designs on selling real estate that did not belong to him but, instead that which belonged to his victims, Thelsey L. Fuller & Edwina J. Fuller.

Simply put, Steven voiced his desires to sell all of the real estate assets while Dad was still living alone in Inglewood.

We didn't realize at the time how he would be able to pull it off but, he did it. Selling one of the homes well below fair market value for a $40,000.00 loss.

But, that my friends is not how the fuckry began or ended this thing has had a lot of twist and turn yet at the end of the day the snake has been exposed.

Know that it is the author's personal opinion that Steven A. is a self-righteous prick, a liar and a thief.

We await the Courts decision as Steven A. with the help of Atty. Teddie J. Randall took over $131,000.00 from the Estate of Edwina Fuller and sold real estate below fair market value.... a violation of his fiduciary duties to the estate and its beneficiaries.

Oh, he also shafted his first attorney, Sandra J. Anderson ESQ, he still owes her in excess of $14,000.00.

BP099211

08/11/2014 at 08:30 am in Department 11, Lesley C. Green, Presiding

FINAL REPORT, FEES & DISTRIBUTION - Case Taken Under Submission

BP135381

08/12/2015 at 01:30 pm in Department 5, Maria E. Stratton, Presiding

FNL ACT/FEES/EXTRA FEES & DIST - Case Taken Under Submission

More to come, we await the Court's decision within the next 60 days.

Case Taken Under Submission

Update - Re: Steven A. Fuller; Case Number BP135381 Fuller, Edwina - Decedent

08/12/2015 at 01:30 pm in Department 5, Maria E. Stratton, Presiding
FINAL ACCOUNTT/FEES/EXTRA FEES & DIST - Case Taken Under Submission

We believe that the Court will rule that Steven A. Fuller with the help of Atty. Teddie J. Randall violated their fiduciary duties in regards to the Estate of Edwina Fuller in that they improperly took $107,692.30 from said estate.

Once that ruling is made we will need an attorney that can file a claim against the bond and or a civil action to recover monies from Steven A. Fuller and Atty. Teddie J. Randall.

If you are an attorney or know an attorney that can handle this type of litigation please get in contact with us.

benamarine@gmail.com

The Estate of Edwina Fuller - $107,692.30

Supreme Court of California

Gird yourselves.

When the Decision comes down from the Court, it's on and crackin'.

We'll be sure they get all of the latest information regarding a couple of fraudsters.

RE: Complaint against attorney Teddie J. Randall #14-18164

BAM! ¤º°`°º‹(•¿•)› º°`°º¤

The Estate of Edwina Fuller - $107,692.30

A hearing was held on 08/12/2015 in regards to the Estate of Edwina Fuller in Los Angeles Superior Court, Case # BP 135 381.

We have learned that the court indicated to both Steven Fuller and his attorney Teddie J. Randall that Mr. Fuller incorrectly took the money from the conservatorship. 

Steven Fuller believed that he had a right to the money because he had a lien on the probate estate. 

The money was placed into the conservatorship not the probate estate and he just took it.

The court took the matter under submission and will issue a written ruling. 

Steven violated his fiduciary duty by taking the money.

More to come.

$107,692.30 - Steven Fuller's deception

The California Department of Health had a lien on the Estate of Edwina Fuller; Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Case # BP 135381.

The judge would not allow me to ask a simple question during the hearing of June 16, 2015.

All I wanted to know or have explained to me is how Carol, Sandra and Robert submitted waivers to the State Dept. of Health in regards to the $72,619.59 lien, in which the state released said lien because all mentioned above are disabled and in order that they would realize an inheritance from their mother, Edwina Fuller.

I don't believe that the release of the lien by the state was meant to facilitate the savaging of the estate by Steven Fuller but, instead so that ALL of Edwina Fuller's issue could obtain a portion of their mother's estate.

I am at a lost being that it was made abundantly clear to me by the Court that I do not, did not have a right to petition the government for grievances or to be heard on behalf of my mother.

Atty. Randall and Steven Fuller did not account for the $107,692.30 to the Court until pressed - an accounting which was not and has not been forwarded to the author as of this writing which I am entitled too.

Without the release of the lien the estate would have been worth a mere $35,072.71 and not nearly enough for Steven Fuller and his various attorneys to enrich themselves.

More to come....

Veritas Semper Fidelis

Suspect Stole Over Half A Million Dollars

Police said that after examining Mele's bank records, it was discovered that Mele had used the victim's funds for his own personal expenses such as entertainment, gambling, and travel.

http://www.keyt.com/news/ventura-man-arrested-for-financial-elder-abuse/33438006

In other news.... 

The Superior Court of California

 County of Los Angeles

Central District

    Case BP135381      FULLER, EDWINA - DECEDENT   

"B. What happened to check in the sum of $107,692.30 dtd 9/29/14 delivered to petnr as conservator of the person and estate of Edwina Fuller from the Thelsey L. Fuller Trust?"

It's been noted that Steven Fuller AKA Steven A. Fuller has been traveling around the nation.

Where has this check been accounted for?

It hasn't been accounted for, it's gone and it's long past time for some answers from the perps.

Click on image to enlarge.