It must be noted that Daniel K. Lak is quite the business man.
The Law Offices of Daniel K. Lak
18101 Von Karman Avenue Suite 330
Irvine, CA 92612
Complaint Type: Refund/Exchange Issues
Amount in Dispute: $747.50
businessconsumeralliance.org/ FullComplaint.aspx?ID= aE5ldEu2RIOFIY6TQATIOg==
Amount in Dispute: $747.50
Summary: Did not receive a refund from the attorney after numerous
attempts. He claimed that they refunded
via check but we never received it.
Resolution Sought:Refund payment
Detail: After attending one of his workshops, they had convinced me that I can sign up for a fully refundable legal service. After 2 weeks, we decided not to proceed with the service and asked for a refund which went back and forth for months and dragging on years. Still have not receive a refund from the attorney after numerous attempts. He claimed that they refunded via check but we never received it. Asked him to provide check number or returned check for proof. Never heard back from them.
Summary: The contract for services clearly states the initial payment is not refundable after 30 days.
Response: Company emailed: The client's claim is without merit. The contract for services clearly states the initial payment is not refundable after 30 days. Client did not contact this office until sometime thereafter and therefore, are not entitled to a refund. Regards, Daniel K. Lak, Esq. Law Offices of Daniel K. Lak 18101 Von Karman Ave. Suite 330 Irvine, CA 92612 Ph:949.225.4477 Fx: 949.225.4478
First of all, there was never a contract handed out that states the service is not refundable after 30 days. I have the handouts and credit card receipt from the workshop and no such information is stated. Secondly, both the law firm and myself kept going back and forth via emails about the refund and he informed that its being looked into, then processed, but all the back and forth took l beyond the 30 day period. The lawyer said that he will look into it and later said that the refund was mailed. However, we never received it and have asked numerous times for him to provide info on the refund. So if the refund was mailed out already as stated by the lawyer, why is the basis of the discussion on the 30 day refund deadline.
Company's Final Response
Final response not provided.
Daniel K. Lak - Not Entitled
Dan doesn't like paying child support and or alimony, eh? He has yet to be suspended by the Supreme Court, Re: State Bar Court Case# 12-O-11263, bouncing checks on a client account.
Daniel K. Lak, Suspended by the Bar
Jan 16, 2013 - Daniel K. Lak has been suspended by the State Bar Court of California*. The case is 12-O11263 60 day actual suspension.
Daniel Kristof Lak, Got Away
RE: SLANDER OF REAL ESTATE TITLE
federal/district-courts/ nevada/nvdce/2:2009cv00686/ 65772/182/
CALIFORNIA STATE BAR COURT vs DANIEL KRISTOF LAK
Monday, October 1, 2012
Hon. Donald F. Miles
12-O -11263 Lak, Daniel Kristof Status Conference